REMINDER: WEIDER PUBLICATIONS, LLC has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Weider Publications, LLC reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Weider Publications, LLC has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. Weider Publications, LLC reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that Weider Publications, LLC deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Self-defense Texas Style
- Thread starter $kully
- Start date
I have zero doubts that this gun nut will walk away unscathed. Aside from the fact that his girlfriend is a judge, gun laws in states like
Texas protect this kind of behavior. He was on his own property and the victim clearly got in his face and grabbed for the gun. That’s all indisputable. The problem is the law doesn’t seem to care that a purely verbal altercation became a deadly altercation within moments of a gun being introduced to the scene.
Texas protect this kind of behavior. He was on his own property and the victim clearly got in his face and grabbed for the gun. That’s all indisputable. The problem is the law doesn’t seem to care that a purely verbal altercation became a deadly altercation within moments of a gun being introduced to the scene.
Trespassing on private property means it's not purely verbal
Republicans gonna RepublicanThat is some Wild West sh!t.
I love how they just ignore the guy after he shot him.
Wouldn't the human reaction be to offer first aid?
fucking hill billies.
I like the clucking chicken sound effect.
This show down had been a long time coming, I bet.
All depends on the law is written in Texas, he did grab for gun, then backed away and was shot. possibly legal. morally indefensible,
What first brought this miscarriage of justice to your attention?
Had you shot him with your .22 rifle in LA wouldn’t he be just as dead?
Is this gonna be the next 20 page thread?
So, are you saying that the guy was smart for getting shot?
(You ended your sentence with a comma (,), I finished it for you)
Nobody's fucking life was in danger before the shooting occured.
If the gun didn't come out, none of it would have happened.
It's funny how no gunturd wants to acknowledge this reality.
The "Weapons Effect"
Research shows that the mere presence of weapons may increase aggression.
www.psychologytoday.com
No, I misinterpreted the comment based on our previous acrimonious exchanges, thanks for noticing the typo.
There's a reason Texas started restricting public carry back in the 1870s. It appears we are going that way again.
It’s not a reality. It’s a widely discredited very old theory that has failed multiple attempts at replication.It's funny how no gunturd wants to acknowledge this reality.
The "Weapons Effect"
Research shows that the mere presence of weapons may increase aggression.
It‘s probably good to remember that psychology is NOT a science.
Last edited:
