RBG *** DONE ***

Billy Ocean

Duke status
Jan 7, 2017
19,330
2,636
113
“We have our options. We have arrows in our quiver that I’m not about to discuss right now, but the fact is we have a big challenge in our country,” Pelosi said. “This president has threatened to not even accept the results of the election.”

So she didn't even use the word impeachment. LOL.

But you're part of the educated electorate!

That comment is not "the Dems want to impeach the President". That's you drawing a stupid conclusion.

Edit: I might add, it's easily as bad as anything Rachel Maddow and her ilk came up with based on Trump's statements, which you explain away with "I know he's an idiot, but..."
she was responding to a question about whether she would consider impeachment

so impeachment is an "arrow in her quiver" in her opinion

you can't be serious if you think the dems aren't agitating for impeachment right now

that's not even the extreme end of the dems
 

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,793
19,733
113
Jacksonville Beach
she was responding to a question about whether she would consider impeachment

so impeachment is an "arrow in her quiver" in her opinion

you can't be serious if you think the dems aren't agitating for impeachment right now

that's not even the extreme end of the dems
Since you registered we have 3.5 years of you carrying Trump's water for every bit of stupid sh!t he says. None of it matters. Nancy says she has "arrows in her quiver". It's some kind of big deal to you.

Let me know when there are multiple QAnon Democrats nominated for House seats.
 

plasticbertrand

Duke status
Jan 12, 2009
21,682
14,515
113
Let me know when there are multiple QAnon Democrats nominated for House seats.
This is the difference between the nutty right and nutty left that nobody wants to acknowledge.

The nutty right is in power and is fundamentally changing this country. Nobody votes for the nutty left.
 

Billy Ocean

Duke status
Jan 7, 2017
19,330
2,636
113
This is the difference between the nutty right and nutty left that nobody wants to acknowledge.

The nutty right is in power and is fundamentally changing this country. Nobody votes for the nutty left.
Kamala is on the senate judiciary committee

that's a tough predicament for her

her base will expect her to bring the crazy against whatever stuck up conservative girl trump taps for the court

but how do you think midwest fat housewives who pick the president will react?
 

Billy Ocean

Duke status
Jan 7, 2017
19,330
2,636
113
Since you registered we have 3.5 years of you carrying Trump's water for every bit of stupid sh!t he says. None of it matters. Nancy says she has "arrows in her quiver". It's some kind of big deal to you.

Let me know when there are multiple QAnon Democrats nominated for House seats.
I'm the only impartial observer here

is QAnon really a thing?

My parents are pretty scared about QAnon and they watch a lot of MSNBC

Where are all of the scary QAnon supporters located? I've never seen one
 

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
69,192
21,687
113
The Bar
but how do you think midwest fat housewives who pick the president will react?
Move to California and demand to recall Newsom while simultaneously requesting to speak to the manager.

The ship sailed but Tucker Max should have been on the philosopher thread. In rating women, those Karens fall into these two categories:

1-star (aka, Common-stock pig): No redeeming qualities. This girl is ugly, usually fat, boring and sucks in just about everyway possible. If you don’t know a common-stock pig when you see one, you are destined to spend the rest of your life with one.

0-star (aka, Wildebeast): The lowest of the low. A 1-star (common-stock pig) with a terrible personality qualifies as a Wildebeast. They should all be put to sleep. This is that loud, disgusting fat girl in the bar that smokes, orders complicated drinks and then spills them on everyone, and is generally just so annoying that you have to actively restrain yourself from kicking her in the crotch and stomping on her throat until she drowns on her own blood. There is no insult too mean or crude for her, and basic human rights do not apply to her.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: grapedrink

Random Guy

Duke status
Jan 16, 2002
32,248
6,421
113
Kamala is on the senate judiciary committee

that's a tough predicament for her

her base will expect her to bring the crazy against whatever stuck up conservative girl trump taps for the court

but how do you think midwest fat housewives who pick the president will react?
Maybe this is an opportunity for her to show that she makes decisions based on facts in the interest of her constituents as opposed to party line politics

maybe She can show she’s not pushing socialism and gain a few of the swing votes
what can I say, im a dreamer
 

GromsDad

Duke status
Jan 21, 2014
55,054
16,850
113
West of the Atlantic. East of the ICW.
Maybe this is an opportunity for her to show that she makes decisions based on facts in the interest of her constituents as opposed to party line politics

maybe She can show she’s not pushing socialism and gain a few of the swing votes
what can I say, im a dreamer
That would actually be a good strategy for her if she'd put aside the partisanship and vote for Trumby's nominee. Its worth noting that 9 republicans voted in favor of seating Sotomayor and 5 voted in favor of Kagan.
 

rice

Duke status
Jul 2, 2002
24,304
1,801
113
CA
Its worth noting that 9 republicans voted in favor of seating Sotomayor and 5 voted in favor of Kagan.
No, "its" not. Both sides have done that.

In blocking Garland, 10 months out from an election, McConnell made this war.

I get that McConnell and Graham said they wouldn't but now they will, because they can and they are liars and this is politics. Anyone who thought any different at the time is silly. I get that.

But everyone should also get that the Dems, IF they win in November, could add blue seats to the SCOTUS or add 2 states (4 blue senate seats) to the US, because they can.
 
  • Like
Reactions: grapedrink

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,793
19,733
113
Jacksonville Beach
I'm the only impartial observer here

is QAnon really a thing?

My parents are pretty scared about QAnon and they watch a lot of MSNBC

Where are all of the scary QAnon supporters located? I've never seen one
GWS is far closer to an impartial observer. Ditto grapedrink.

QAnon is really a thing. A guy really walked into a ping pong/pizza parlor in Washington DC, armed to the teeth, demanding to see a basement that doesn't exist. A bunch of right wing nutjobs sporting Q patches on their ICE or CBP or whatever other narcfest shitheel agency uniforms aren't a big deal. Unless you're attending a protest or some sh!t.

The favorite to win a district in Western Colorado, and the favorite to win a district in NW Georgia are open QAnon people.

From how you describe your zone, I think QAnon people, you probably find them to be crazy-eyed people with velcro shoes and a fanny pack, and you just default into Northeast City mind your own business/don't be a target. You're in a very, very small corner of the country where the "shy Trump voter" is a thing.

In 98% of the rest of America (I'm basically excluding OC, South Bay LA, and a subset of Anglo males in Silicon Valley) the "shy Trump voter" only has one Trump flag flying from a rodholder in their pickup bed at all times.

No, "its" not. Both sides have done that.

In blocking Garland, 10 months out from an election, McConnell made this war.

I get that McConnell and Graham said they wouldn't but now they will, because they can and they are liars and this is politics. Anyone who thought any different at the time is silly. I get that.

But everyone should also get that the Dems, IF they win in November, could add blue seats to the SCOTUS or add 2 states (4 blue senate seats) to the US, because they can.
Edit: rice this is an expansion on your post, not an argument against it.

The problem with Garland is he didn't even get a hearing, much less an up/down vote.

People act like Bork was somehow analogous. No. Bork was obviously a whackjob in committee, and the committee recommended he be rejected by the Senate, but they advanced to the full floor vote 9-5.

There were more Republican "no" votes than Democratic "yes" votes for Bork.

But President Reagan's pick had his day, in Judiciary Committee AND before the full Senate, with 56 Democrats in the Senate. The Democrats went through the entire "Advise and Consent" process. Government functioned correctly.

Garland was just Mitch McConnell going "you'll have to burn Georgia and South Carolina to the ground all over again, because we're stubborn partisans".
 
Last edited:

GromsDad

Duke status
Jan 21, 2014
55,054
16,850
113
West of the Atlantic. East of the ICW.
No, "its" not. Both sides have done that.

In blocking Garland, 10 months out from an election, McConnell made this war.

I get that McConnell and Graham said they wouldn't but now they will, because they can and they are liars and this is politics. Anyone who thought any different at the time is silly. I get that.

But everyone should also get that the Dems, IF they win in November, could add blue seats to the SCOTUS or add 2 states (4 blue senate seats) to the US, because they can.
The two situations are completely different. You should get over the Garland thing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: grapedrink

Billy Ocean

Duke status
Jan 7, 2017
19,330
2,636
113
Aggro trumpists are extremely rare where I live and the few times I see them i find them to be generally frightening, angry looking people

I can totally understand if these people are common where you live why you would be a bit freaked out about it
 

mundus

Duke status
Feb 26, 2018
37,546
16,523
113
Aggro trumpists are extremely rare where I live and the few times I see them i find them to be generally frightening, angry looking people

I can totally understand if these people are common where you live why you would be a bit freaked out about it
So no longer a proud member of the cult?