REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Question for the Trumpanzees
- Thread starter $kully
- Start date
Did nothing wrong.
Also, now we know that in 2016 Obama himself was worried about Hunter and Burisma. Trump as president had an obligation to get to the bottom of any corruption going on there.
84288475_603016547200421_6864076302209820385_n - Streamable
Biden is the president? Whoa!
I didn't even know he's in the government.
Need to keep up with news better.
How would you know?
He's withholding key evidence.
All the indications are he's impeachable AF.
Even without evidence he's hiding, he's done way worse things than Nixon or Clinton got impeached over.
G, have you taken the time to read this? It's long. But man, if this is a nothing burger than nothing is something burger.
Trump, Ukraine And The Path To The Impeachment Inquiry: A Timeline
www.npr.org
If this doesn't get shut down. EVERY president from here on with a majority opposing party is totally fair game for impeachment for even the most minor uses of their privileges. Obama had probably 8-10 instances of similar suspect privilege. Bush II had plenty, Clinton had WAY more than Monica/Flowers and crew. Bush I surely had a few. Reagan also.
This is setting a very poor standard for bastardizing and weaponizing impeachment for purely political revenge.
The vote has nothing to do with what's actually right and wrong, and this country may yet elect Biden into that office despite his history of selling his office.G, have you taken the time to read this? It's long. But man, if this is a nothing burger than nothing is something burger.
Trump, Ukraine And The Path To The Impeachment Inquiry: A Timeline
Long before the phone call that sparked a whistleblower complaint and then an impeachment inquiry, the story of Ukraine was a preoccupation for the president.
It pays to be a winner.
Can you give comparable examples of a president withholding of aid from a foreign country to supply dirt on his opponent in the next election?
I'm confused.
You said he might not of done anything to be impeach for.
Then I present the timeline, which shows that he tried to get Ukraine to announce an investigation against his opponent in the next election. (evidence)
Then you say the vote has nothing to do with right or wrong, which seems like a non sequitor.
Your presumption and assuming it was purely for "dirt on his opponent for next election" is completely subjective and not factual. If it was for anyone else, other than Hunter Biden, it would be OK, right? Digging for corruption before providing military aid is a crime now?
Trump, the principled corruption fighter LOL! Why didn't he use official channels instead of shady eastern European operatives?