therein lies the rub....So the real bet would be conviction.
I can't believe how horrible Barr is....
the real question is whether a crime was committed...not whether
this outfit is able to instantiate a show trial.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
therein lies the rub....So the real bet would be conviction.
I can't believe how horrible Barr is....
I just wanted to make sure you were well aware of how you changed your tune from basically doubting this would even make it to the prosecutorial phase to NOW making it about convictions.you're logic can be applied to you as well....
you don't have confidence that this will yield convictions?
a very interesting change of tone for someone who's heretofore been
quite confident that all these people are going to go down...
I just don't trust Barr.I just wanted to make sure you were well aware of how you changed your tune from basically doubting this would even make it to the prosecutorial phase to NOW making it about convictions.
OK. I'll let you change it to convictions by Sept 2020, since it will take a bit longer after the prosecutorial phase to get to convictions, if they get that far, right?
How about this, for each person convicted of a criminal charges, an extra $50? And to make it fair, each person prosecuted, but NOT convicted, you get the $50 back? So, if "lucky" it could either be a wash or a windfall.
OK. Done.I just don't trust Barr.
let's keep it simple.
a conviction stemming from Horowitz report by Sept 2020 like you said above.
Depends on whether or not you count Native Americans killed by diseaseHas anyone run the numbers on which cult has killed more over the years: Catholics or Muslims?
Oh you're now a holocaust denier as well?Depends on whether or not you count Native Americans killed by disease
I'd consider that an indirect kill. Maybe worth 3/5, the given ratio of the times?Depends on whether or not you count Native Americans killed by disease
Remember how far the Muslims spread their religion by the sword. From Gilbartar to India and beyond. The Ottomans were particularly nasty on a certain peninsula that we're all fans of here, and then there was the whole slave trade all up and down and around the coast of AfricaI'd consider that an indirect kill. Maybe worth 3/5, the given ratio of the times?
Do Muslims have an equivalent? Or do they get a multiplier because of relative lack of efficiency?
Thanks - that one felt good when I dragged it from the neurons.Remember how far the Muslims spread their religion by the sword. From Gilbartar to India and beyond. The Ottomans were particularly nasty on a certain peninsula that we're all fans of here, and then there was the whole slave trade all up and down and around the coast of Africa
A+ on the 3/5 reference
If you don't count killing their own, Catholics have killed more by a long shot.Has anyone run the numbers on which cult has killed more over the years: Catholics or Muslims?