Uh wrong, you've never tackled Auto's questions and engaged in the debate.Autoprax is simply doing the same thing that you, Fecal, and a couple others routinely do
You don't like a comparison because it illustrates holes in one of the solutions you agree with, so you complicate the simple comparison until it doesn't work anymore. This is simply attribute substitution in a different way. This can be done with any kind of comparison since no object is exactly alike
Then, in addition to nuancing the comparison into meaninglessness, you double down on your weak position of saying BAD AT COMPARISONS with ad hominem and the EVERYONE I DISAGREE WITH IZ DUMB fallacy.
The meme can be mansplained to you all like this- not everyone with a gun is going to commit a mass shooting, just like not everyone with a penis is going to commit a rape. People who own guns shouldn't have to give up their guns simply because some people with guns commit mass shootings, just like people who own penises shouldn't have to give up their penises because some people with dicks commit rapes
Can you explain the second part of the metaphor?
How is more stringent gun laws like chopping off a dick?
I don't think guns should be outlawed.
Please explain.Autoprax is smart enough to understand the 2nd part of the metaphor without explanation
If he doesn't get it he is being willfully obtuse.
It's also fantastic that they always ignore the vast majority of people who are taxpayers and who would benefit, and concentrate on the tiny minority who has negligible effect on the system.But the term socialism means nothing. It's a vague abstraction, a conservative straw man.