plant-based vs paleo / carnivore diet

sh3

Michael Peterson status
Dec 1, 2008
2,735
3,799
113
Was telling my wife about this thread and she sent me this:

Plant sterols can bind to cholesterol and prevent them from being reabsorbed into your body and taken out in the stool thereby lowering cholesterol. Taking 2 grams of plant sterols/day can lower LDL chol by 10%. Found in beans, legumes, nuts, seeds. If LDL is not reducing then add in vegetable sources of protein ex. beans, legumes, nuts, seeds. Fish oil can lower LDL chol and tags. If has low HDL and high Tags then use fish oil supplement. Use 2-4 grams/day. Keep in the fridge. Can also use ground flaxseed as well. One ounce of nuts (24 almonds, 15 walnut halves, 15 pecan halves) 5 days/week can help cholesterol. Keep them in your freezer.

Also tell your friend that he might be a lean mass hyper-responder: people who are athletic and thin, and they are very, very low carb, and therefore see very high levels of LDL-C and LDL-P, but they also have very high levels of HDL-C and low levels of triglycerides.

About testing, remember standard cholesterol tests only tell us the weight of cholesterol in the blood, so a “normal” LDL of 100 mg/dL doesn’t tell us much because the same amount of cholesterol could consist of a few large, fluffy particles or hundreds of dense, dangerous particles. In contrast, lipoprotein fractionation is the gold standard of lipid tests because it shows us how our cholesterol is packaged: breaking down the distribution of LDL, HDL, and triglycerides by size, particle number, and density. Most primary care physicians and even cardiologists simply aren’t caught up on the technology or are stuck in old ways of practicing medicine.
She's a freaking biochemist. It's awesome.
 

Mr J

Michael Peterson status
Aug 18, 2003
2,307
1,533
113
Regional Vic, Australia
So you feel that metric is outdated, and you guys feel comfortable to ignore your LDL count if it rises, and discount that as a warning sign of heart disease, etc.? ...
I have been trying to unpack the two quotes from sh3 and reforest that you posted in your opening post and I think I am some of the way there with some help from AI.

No sh3 and his doctor of nutrition wife are not saying that on face value - they are saying only get concerned if its the "pellet" consistency that is sending the LDL up. The floss consistency LDL is the one to feel comfortable about. For people like me who don't have access a doc whose clinic can order and interpret "lipoprotein fractionation" the advice he gave me on getting floss up and pellet down appears to be good conventionally accepted - eg canola seed oil is pushed as healthy but ai pointed out its highly processed and subjected to all sorts of heat and chemical treatments. So for me that would mean swapping it for virgin olive oil that I can get in any supermarket - that's going to send HDL up and sit just fine with conventional health guidelines. Also reading between the lines of the snippet posted by sh3's wife its ok to try and get overall LDL down if that's the only LDL number we can get in the absence of a fractionation test.

Regarding the Jupiter study on statins ai pointed out it was done on a group who didn't have cholesterol - it didn't go so far as to say it was bullshit, but my personal reading between the lines of the study suggests to me that it showed statins are good for the heart for people with a specific inflammation marker and no more than that. Although my personal attitude is that doesn't negate other advice on statins. When I got tested my doc told me that my LDL is a bit too high, however various stats such as my high HDL was fed into the heart risk calculator and risk came out low. Statins were not suggested. I am on nuts and seeds as suggested by sh3's wife.

ai sent me a link on the bad effects of sugar oxidising cholesterol - maybe its the oxidising that is bad and not so much the LDL? I don't know. However shunning sugar (again conventionally accepted advice) appears to be the only commonality between Dr Shawn Baker and our in house doctor of nutrition. When I posted my sample meal sh3 said make sure I get vegetables for antioxidising - see conversation above :) In contrast the Dr Baker diet shuns all things plant including veggies!

Have I got that about right @sh3 and @ReForest ?
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: ReForest and sh3

gbg

Miki Dora status
Jan 22, 2006
4,118
3,806
113
I eat grass fed beef and fruit and have never felt better. I eat beets and greens too. Lost 20lbs. Stronger and leaner than I have been in decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr J

casa_mugrienta

Duke status
Apr 13, 2008
45,174
19,980
113
Petak Island
Just perused this thread... and as these threads go there's a few things posted here that flat out aren't true.

-Bottom line should be moderation.
-It is so easy to lose and maintain weight at a healthy level: Portion control, whole grains and vegetables, plenty of protein, and stop eating sweets/sugar.
-If you need help with that, or find it still too difficult, control your salt intake to say around 1000 to 1500mg/day. That alone will force you to portion control.
- You're not going to damage your body by eating on the low cholesterol side of things.

Also, if you're getting decent sleep, some tiredness in the early afternoon is normal part of a well regulated circadian rhythm. Your body wants a siesta. A short nap, 10 or 20 minutes, is a good idea. Personally I have found when I am consistently getting a good night's rest and going to sleep/waking up at the same time my body demands a quick nap at this time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: freeride76

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
13,559
9,635
113
Just perused this thread... and as these threads go there's a few things posted here that flat out aren't true.

-Bottom line should be moderation.
-It is so easy to lose and maintain weight at a healthy level: Portion control, whole grains and vegetables, plenty of protein, and stop eating sweets/sugar.
-If you need help with that, or find it still too difficult, control your salt intake to say around 1000 to 1500mg/day. That alone will force you to portion control.
- You're not going to damage your body by eating on the low cholesterol side of things.

Also, if you're getting decent sleep, some tiredness in the early afternoon is normal part of a well regulated circadian rhythm. Your body wants a siesta. A short nap, 10 or 20 minutes, is a good idea. Personally I have found when I am consistently getting a good night's rest and going to sleep/waking up at the same time my body demands a quick nap at this time.
These threads tend to bark up the wrong tree entirely:
1706970782564.png
 

casa_mugrienta

Duke status
Apr 13, 2008
45,174
19,980
113
Petak Island
  • Like
Reactions: TeamScam and PRCD

PRCD

Tom Curren status
Feb 25, 2020
13,559
9,635
113
I'd add, how good is the research behind what a lot of the so-called experts out there are touting? And to what degree are they cherrypicking?

Pretty much everyone is saying something different and they have studies to back it up. To me that says a lot.
My paternal grandparents lived to be 100. My paternal grandfather had only one lung because he contracted pneumonia in a German prison camp in Poland after being shot down in his 13th bombing run over Germany. He also smoked at one point. He never exercised and ate no health foods. He had a Great Depression diet of canned foods, casseroles, and other midwestern crap. My paternal grandmother lived slightly longer and the same way. My maternal grandfather drank and ate too much and died at 87 after a rapid decline following a fall from a ladder (he painted his own house every other year). They all had community: they went to church, veterans meet-ups, or - in the case of my maternal grandfather - were members of social clubs like the Elks.

People carve out a living in the fitness industry by making bold claims that distinguish them from the hundreds of thousands of other people trying to earn a living in the same space. There's not much money in it - Arnold Schwarznegger stopped training people because he realized they don't care about fitness. Guys like Huberman and Attia are a variation on this with a twist - people are afraid of dying so it's easier to sell longevity.

The truth is, we're all going to die sooner rather than later. The question we should be wrestling with is, "What will eternity look like for us?"
 

estreet

Miki Dora status
Feb 19, 2021
5,413
4,728
113
San Diego
I read Attia’s book and what seemed unique in his approach to aging is how he kind of reverse engineers it, determining what you’d like to be able to do at an advanced age and then training to meet that goal. For example, if you want to shortboard at 70 you may have to train to maintain mussel mass, cardiovascular capacity, flexibility, and balance, as well as eat well, in order to have that ability at 70.
 

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
33,243
13,842
113
I read Attia’s book and what seemed unique in his approach to aging is how he kind of reverse engineers it, determining what you’d like to be able to do at an advanced age and then training to meet that goal. For example, if you want to shortboard at 70 you may have to train to maintain mussel mass, cardiovascular capacity, flexibility, and balance, as well as eat well, in order to have that ability at 70.
It’s a good idea to do that if you want to live to 70.
 

estreet

Miki Dora status
Feb 19, 2021
5,413
4,728
113
San Diego
It’s a good idea to do that if you want to live to 70.
I agree it’s a good lifestyle regardless though you may not be fully appreciating the point. You can live to 70 with an unhealthy lifestyle but your capacity for physical activities may be greatly diminished, and you could suffer a lot of pain and other discomforts that could have been avoided.
 

Duffy LaCoronilla

Duke status
Apr 27, 2016
41,354
32,817
113
I haven’t really read everything here but my two cents….

- I just lost about 20 in 9 weeks.

I did it by simply by caloric restriction. I already “exercise” to the point of bodily damage so increasing activity was not an option.

I completely stopped eating dessert foods, sweets, processed foods. No breakfast, no lunch, as much as I can eat for dinner. Meat, potatoes, a bit of green stuff is typical.

I am hungry all the time but have more energy during the day.

- All this talk is about dietary cholesterol is a waste of time. Heart disease is almost entirely genetic. Yolo.

- Listen to whatever @sh3 is saying. I met him person. He’s a stud. He looks fit and healthy and rides very small surfboards. I’m guessing he’s in his mid forties.

If I was gay I’d be parked out in front of his house right now hoping to get a glimpse of him rinsing off his wetsuit.

IMG_4188.gif
 

Autoprax

Duke status
Jan 24, 2011
70,128
24,509
113
63
Vagina Point
I haven’t really read everything here but my two cents….

- I just lost about 20 in 9 weeks.

I did it by simply by caloric restriction. I already “exercise” to the point of bodily damage so increasing activity was not an option.

I completely stopped eating dessert foods, sweets, processed foods. No breakfast, no lunch, as much as I can eat for dinner. Meat, potatoes, a bit of green stuff is typical.

I am hungry all the time but have more energy during the day.

- All this talk is about dietary cholesterol is a waste of time. Heart disease is almost entirely genetic. Yolo.

- Listen to whatever @sh3 is saying. I met him person. He’s a stud. He looks fit and healthy and rides very small surfboards. I’m guessing he’s in his mid forties.

If I was gay I’d be parked out in front of his house right now hoping to get a glimpse of him rinsing off his wetsuit.

View attachment 172025
I lost 8 pounds in 2 week doing 1100-1600 a day.

I don't feel energized.

I go into fight or flight hard. Lots of food noise.

7 more pounds to go to hit the target weight.
 

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
33,243
13,842
113
I agree it’s a good lifestyle regardless though you may not be fully appreciating the point. You can live to 70 with an unhealthy lifestyle but your capacity for physical activities may be greatly diminished, and you could suffer a lot of pain and other discomforts that could have been avoided.
I appreciate the point. I’m 18 months away from 70. You? Remember, you have to live that long to qualify.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pescado713

casa_mugrienta

Duke status
Apr 13, 2008
45,174
19,980
113
Petak Island
How does that work?
Because you immediately eliminate a ton of processed foods, snack foods, foods with sauces, etc.

It will restrict what's available to eat in a good way.

Lunch for me would be broccoli, some whole grain pasta with seasoning, and tuna or chicken.
That's around 400-500 calories.
The tuna or pasta I'd douse in EVOO (I need the calories.) Or I'd add walnuts. Adds 150 cals.
Sodium content around 500mg or less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr J

casa_mugrienta

Duke status
Apr 13, 2008
45,174
19,980
113
Petak Island
I agree it’s a good lifestyle regardless though you may not be fully appreciating the point. You can live to 70 with an unhealthy lifestyle but your capacity for physical activities may be greatly diminished, and you could suffer a lot of pain and other discomforts that could have been avoided.
Attia is exercising something like 4 hours a day.
The rest of the time he is trying to figure out how to replace calories burned via his restrictive diet.
Not realistic for 95% of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRCD and grapedrink

estreet

Miki Dora status
Feb 19, 2021
5,413
4,728
113
San Diego
I appreciate the point. I’m 18 months away from 70. You? Remember, you have to live that long to qualify.
I turned 62 last month. Still surf a shortboard comfortably. I'm 5'11, 165 lbs and the last board I got was a 5'10 Pyzel RT and it feels like the perfect size for me. I'm only good for about 2 hours max in the water though, at least in order to fully recover by the next day. Fitness has always been a lifestyle, so my story may add some credence to Attia's work.

Also, as I mentioned in an earlier post, in the last few years I've noticed how dramatic proper nutrition can be for an old active person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr J