REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Is it 5% or 10%? 10% is twice as much as 5%The padded death counts are already a known entity.
You can test positive, and be basically be symptom free, but die in a car accident with it, and you get counted as dying from CV-19. Same with people basically in nursing homes with DNR's and on death watch. They get it, and instant CV-19 death, even with multiple comorbidity already taking them out.
Sad that people are dying of this more than typical deaths, but these are why counts are high.
If you take all those out, and look at true CV-19 ONLY related deaths, it's probably 5%, no more than 10% of total deaths.
What makes you interpret the posts a gleeful?This from a guy who reports daily, with glee, about people getting sick and dying.
Subjectivity of experience.What makes you interpret the posts a gleeful?
I’ll take meaningless phrases for 200, AlexSubjectivity of experience.
Experience is subjective.I’ll take meaningless phrases for 200, Alex
What makes you think they're not. He toned it down for a while after I started a thread calling him out for it. He's doing it again. Hal doesn't give a rats ass about the number of cases or death counts beyond how much he can use it as a tool to attack the other side.What makes you interpret the posts a gleeful?
I'd have to say it's closer to 5% (but said maybe 10% as benefit of doubt, max).Is it 5% or 10%? 10% is twice as much as 5%
That's some Bohter level channel you're watching there Dog. Try reading this. It's not as sensational but it's not as weak as your source, who basically proves nothing.I'd have to say it's closer to 5% (but said maybe 10% as benefit of doubt, max).
I know they did a study in SD on the actual CV-19 ONLY deaths (no comorbidity at all) a month or so back. Out of something like 230 deaths designated as CV-19 (at that time), only 7 were actual CV-19 ONLY deaths. That in itself is only like barely 3% of CV-19 "designated" deaths.
THIS is the reason why......
this is not how you stop a pandemic.That's some Bohter level channel you're watching there Dog. Try reading this. It's not as sensational but it's not as weak as your source, who basically proves nothing.
How COVID-19 Deaths Are Counted
Assigning a cause of death is never straightforward, but data on excess deaths suggest coronavirus death tolls are likely an underestimatewww.scientificamerican.com
As coronavirus has swept through the United States, finding the true number of people who have been infected has been stymied due to lack of testing. Now, official counts of coronavirus deaths are being challenged, too.
In Colorado, for example, a Republican state legislator has accused the state’s public health department of falsely inflating COVID-19 deaths; in Florida, local media have objected to the State Department of Health’s refusal to release medical examiner data to the public, alleging that the state may be underreporting deaths.
The reality is that assigning a cause of death is not always straightforward, even pre-pandemic, and a patchwork of local rules and regulations makes getting valid national data challenging. However, data on excess deaths in the United States over the past several months suggest that COVID-19 deaths are probably being undercounted rather than overcounted.
where did you find the daily deaths....it's a hard stat to find online
Your "article" is almost 2 months old. That's like 2 years ago in CV-19 statistic "studies".That's some Bohter level channel you're watching there Dog. Try reading this. It's not as sensational but it's not as weak as your source, who basically proves nothing.
How COVID-19 Deaths Are Counted
Assigning a cause of death is never straightforward, but data on excess deaths suggest coronavirus death tolls are likely an underestimatewww.scientificamerican.com
As coronavirus has swept through the United States, finding the true number of people who have been infected has been stymied due to lack of testing. Now, official counts of coronavirus deaths are being challenged, too.
In Colorado, for example, a Republican state legislator has accused the state’s public health department of falsely inflating COVID-19 deaths; in Florida, local media have objected to the State Department of Health’s refusal to release medical examiner data to the public, alleging that the state may be underreporting deaths.
The reality is that assigning a cause of death is not always straightforward, even pre-pandemic, and a patchwork of local rules and regulations makes getting valid national data challenging. However, data on excess deaths in the United States over the past several months suggest that COVID-19 deaths are probably being undercounted rather than overcounted.