Does anyone really go by the data?
Doesn't the feeling come first and you seek out data that supports what you want to believe?
Doesn't the feeling come first and you seek out data that supports what you want to believe?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You're talking about Aristotle's categories: logos, pathos, ethos? Yeah, I think it is based off of pathos and mostly ethos, namely that powerful men with high cultural capital have decided what they want and how they're going to get us with their program. Minding Richard Feynman's famous saying that the most important thing is not to fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool, I like looking at data. Dr. John Campbell likes to look at data also, but that moves the questions further back to "Which data are gathered, which ignored, and why?" Also, how did guys like me find him? You posted him, I watched, he seems credible to me because he approaches analysis the same way and provides references. His drawback, in my opinion, is that he comes from a bygone era where people trusted public officials. The FDA of today is not what it was 30 years ago. How did you find Dr. John Campbell. Did YouTube send him to you? Why did you think he was credible?Does anyone really go by the data?
Doesn't the feeling come first and you seek out data that supports what you want to believe?
Alan Aragon reccomended him.You're talking about Aristotle's categories: logos, pathos, ethos? Yeah, I think it is based off of pathos and mostly ethos, namely that powerful men with high cultural capital have decided what they want and how they're going to get us with their program. Minding Richard Feynman's famous saying that the most important thing is not to fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool, I like looking at data. Dr. John Campbell likes to look at data also, but that moves the questions further back to "Which data are gathered, which ignored, and why?" Also, how did guys like me find him? You posted him, I watched, he seems credible to me because he approaches analysis the same way and provides references. His drawback, in my opinion, is that he comes from a bygone era where people trusted public officials. The FDA of today is not what it was 30 years ago. How did you find Dr. John Campbell. Did YouTube send him to you? Why did you think he was credible?
Then there's the research showing that you can look at facts all day but you can't make a decision without the part of your brain responsible for intuition or gut feeling.
The process Alan describes here is almost completely gone from science. The scientific community also seems less and less interested in honesty and more interested in steamrolling with consensus.
I think they studied people that had damage in that part of the brain and found that they couldn't make decisions at all.I read that book about the effect of emotion on judgment.
But I forget everything I learned.
Something to the effect that completely eliminating emotion actually compromises your decision making.
I don't know about that, afoafum....just like Gerson and a thousand other quacks before...
labelling something "banned" is just another monetization ploy
in this case, it prays on the fear and ignorance of an audience in search of hope
sad
Making decisions based on the data has been a part of my day job for 41 years now....every day.Does anyone really go by the data?
Doesn't the feeling come first and you seek out data that supports what you want to believe?
Why ignore my question?From that Stanford paper re the ineffective mask wearing for protection from SARs-CoV-2 virus....
Less masking....equals healthier ninja's and bank robbers....
Immune system degradation much?
The cure seems worse than the disease....hmmmm?
That's suspicious....don't ya think?
Makes me feel like a brian sturgeonI like wearing a mask. Makes me feel like a Ninja.
What are these "toxins" that build up in our bodies?I don't know about that, afoafum....
Lots of banning going on these days too.....some big channels that were talking about this stuff....
The first step in the banning / cancelling process is/was de-monitization...
Youtube is the champ in this arena...
So nope....not a monetization ploy....in the current sense....
So....about that Gerson fella...
"General Information
The Gerson therapy is a complex regimen advocated by its supporters to treat cancer and other degenerative diseases. It consists of a specialized diet to “detoxify” the body and rebuild the immune system, adding vitamin and mineral supplements to help in these processes. Coffee enemas are an essential part of the regimen. The therapy is named for its developer, Max Gerson, a German physician who emigrated to the United States and started a medical practice in New York City in 1938.[1,2]
The Gerson therapy is rooted in the belief that cancer is a disease of the whole organism, the tumor being only a symptom of a diseased body. Gerson considered cancer to be an accumulation of several damaging factors that combine to cause the deterioration of the entire metabolic system. The goal of the Gerson therapy is to bring the body back to its normal metabolic state, or as near to this state as possible, and to keep the metabolism in natural equilibrium.[1,2]
Gerson observed that cancer patients exhibited markedly degenerated organs, especially the liver, presumably caused by the clearing of toxic materials of an unknown type that the disease produced. He also noted that the situation became worse after chemotherapy, probably because of more toxic products entering the bloodstream. Gerson’s regimen focused on helping the liver rid the body of toxic substances while restoring and maintaining healthy liver function.[1,2]
According to Gerson, during the detoxification process that results from the Gerson diet, the liver becomes progressively overburdened as the body rids itself of toxic substances formed by the breakdown of cancer cells. Coffee enemas, pancreatic enzymes, and crude liver extract are used to help the liver deal with the burden of removing toxic substances.[1-5]
Total control of everything that enters and leaves the body is the governing principle of the Gerson regimen. Its three main components are strict diet, nutritional supplements, and regular enemas."
The above from...
Gerson Therapy (PDQ®)
Gerson therapy is advocated by its supporters as a method of treating cancer patients based on changes in diet and nutrient intake. No results of laboratory or animal studies have been published in scientific journals. Get detailed information about Gerson therapy in this summary for clinicians.www.cancer.gov
His approach seems pretty basic to me.....
I know someone who had really poor health about 15 years ago...
Sick all the time....joint issues too....
He went full Gerson....and is now one of the healthiest people I know....never gets sick.
Seems rather intuitive that if you improve your diet and de-tox.....it leads to a healthier body....no?
He did not go full germaphobe to accomplish this.
Que Auto re the coffee enemas part...
Oops....wrong orifice...
Bring me an isolated particle of the Ebola virus....and we'll talk.Why ignore my question?
Are they saying mask wearing is ineffective for the same reason as you?
Germ theory is BS?
Can you not see the contradiction in your thinking?
I can.
I don't like wearing a mask either so this is welcome news to me.
Anything that is a detriment to cellular health.What are these "toxins" that build up in our bodies?
Have they been isolated and identified?
So you agree with conspirators when their conclusions support what you want to believe?Bring me an isolated particle of the Ebola virus....and we'll talk.
And no....they're not saying germ theory is BS.
But the mask non-efficacy conclusions totally supports the fact that airborne virus particles are not the root cause.....supports the argument that "it's not the germ....it's the terrain.
Toxic substances....other threats to cellular health.....
Huge amounts of research going on with gut biomes right now. Lot's of links between bad gut and bad brain.What are these "toxins" that build up in our bodies?
Have they been isolated and identified?
er....ah.....about those masks.....
Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis
Many countries across the globe utilized medical and non-medical facemasks as non-pharmaceutical intervention for reducing the transmission and infectivity of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Although, scientific evidence supporting facemasks’ ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Study Quietly Published at NIH.Gov Proves Face Masks Are Absolutely Worthless Against Covid [Updated]
Article originally published at American Conservative Movement and transferred here for posterity. Update: Stanford University has disavowed the study, sayingamericanconservativemovement.com
Two years ago Germaphobia was considered a mental condition....
And now we know.....the whole world has gone crazy....