Obama’s Recovery Act turns eleven.....

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,552
23,135
113
Calling the first 2-3 years of Obama “growth” is a stretch. Anyone who was unemployed during that time will remember.
things were still on the downswing even after Bush's recovery act

a testament to the delayed effects of economic interventionism
 

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,611
19,539
113
Jacksonville Beach
GDP growth in 2010 was higher than 2017 and 2019. The stock market doubled in Obama's first three years. There were fewer people unemployed at the end of that time than at the start.

I mean if I was trying to boast about the economy I'd be stocked to get handed 5% unemployment and $500B in deficits, increase the deficit spending by 2.5% of GDP, and hop on twitter and suck myself off to 2.5% growth.

WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED!
 

grapedrink

Duke status
May 21, 2011
26,143
14,940
113
A Beach
things were still on the downswing even after Bush's recovery act

a testament to the delayed effects of economic interventionism
For sure. However by saying "more than a decade" intentionally states, by definition, that you've had 10+ years of growth. That would push that growth at a minimum to January 2010 as the starting point, if not earlier, which is absolutely laughable. IMO it's insulting to the people who actually struggled during that time.

There were some good aspects to the ACA, such as pre-existing conditions, but tying health insurance to employers was a mistake for job growth at that time.
 

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,611
19,539
113
Jacksonville Beach
For sure. However by saying "more than a decade" intentionally states, by definition, that you've had 10+ years of growth. That would push that growth at a minimum to January 2010 as the starting point, if not earlier, which is absolutely laughable. IMO it's insulting to the people who actually struggled during that time.

There were some good aspects to the ACA, such as pre-existing conditions, but tying health insurance to employers was a mistake for job growth at that time.
Is growth when GDP growth resumes after 2 or more quarters of negative GDP growth, aka a recession, or is there some formula where facts care about people's feelings we need to incorporate?
 

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
32,120
12,103
113
ok, die, boomers
Yeah, because your generation has it covered. Every generation says the same thing. Then they mature.

I consider your post to be threatening and by extension bullying. Come verga.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: GWS_2

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
32,120
12,103
113
Without us you wouldn’t have a job that allows you to post on the internet all day long you ungrateful prick. Kick the side fins out of your decrepit thruster and show us your t!ts.
 

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,611
19,539
113
Jacksonville Beach
Yeah, because your generation has it covered. Every generation says the same thing. Then they mature.

I consider your post to be threatening and by extension bullying. Come verga.
Our generation is on track to be just as bad. Since about 1980 there's been roughly a half hour with no deficit spending. There's nothing mature about thinking there is something good about blowing $1T/year this many years into an expansion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the janitor

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
68,953
21,339
113
The Bar
Without us you wouldn’t have a job that allows you to post on the internet all day long you ungrateful prick. Kick the side fins out of your decrepit thruster and show us your t!ts.
You'll be less cranky after your nap.
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,479
2,305
113
Trump should thank obama for giving a push on the swings

View attachment 86615

What you and your accomplice Barry are doing is called "cherry picking". What your graph omits is the economic growth before Obama took office. The growth rate looked roughly like the growth rate leading out of the disastrous economic downturn caused by the 2007-08 Democrat tax-and-spend congress combined with Obama's impositions of draconian restrictions on economic freedom. Sure, people are going to get tired of being on unemployment rations and take lesser jobs. And the economy will start rising again, but it's no thanks to Obummer.

Barry's peak unemployment rate was 10%. Trump has the lowest unemployment rate since WWII. Obummer never saw a a GDP growth rate as high as 3%. Trump has not seen one below 3%. You can't stifle an economy, then hand out money to your political cronies, and expect that to represent a "stimulus".

Normally growth rates are attributable to congress, the people who hold the purse strings. However, in Barry's case, he smacked capitalists so hard that he multiplied the Democrat congress's spending downturn by two. All Trump had to do to look like an economic genius was to remove Obummer's restrictions.
.
 

Ifallalot

Duke status
Dec 17, 2008
88,772
17,864
113
things were still on the downswing even after Bush's recovery act

a testament to the delayed effects of economic interventionism
A testament to kicking the can down the road to create a bigger bubble in the future.

Fuck Greta!
 
  • Like
Reactions: afoaf

Kento

Duke status
Jan 11, 2002
68,953
21,339
113
The Bar
What you and your accomplice Barry are doing is called "cherry picking". What your graph omits is the economic growth before Obama took office. The growth rate looked roughly like the growth rate leading out of the disastrous economic downturn caused by the 2006-07 Democrat tax-and-spend congress combined with Obama's impositions of draconian restrictions on economic freedom. Sure, people are going to get tired of being on unemployment rations and take lesser jobs. And the economy will start rising again, but it's no thanks to Obummer.

Barry's peak unemployment rate was 10%. Trump has the lowest unemployment rate since WWII. Obummer never saw a a GDP growth rate as high as 3%. Trump has not seen one below 3%. You can't stifle an economy, then hand out money to your political cronies, and expect that to represent a "stimulus".

Normally growth rates are attributable to congress, the people who hold the purse strings. However, in Barry's case, he smacked capitalists so hard that he multiplied the Democrat congress's spending downturn by two. All Trump had to do to look like an economic genius was to remove Obummer's restrictions.
.
Quarterly or annually? Obama had a few over 4%, a number Trump has not achieved once. In fact, Trump's last quarters were barely above 2% and that's while juicing the economy at Barry Bonds level.

You fail to mention the crash at the end of Bush's term. Everything from 2010 forward has trended towards where we are now.