if you want to be really pedantic, yesNo, there's actually a big difference and many people don't pick up on it.
but I believe that people naturally infer the caveats
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
if you want to be really pedantic, yesNo, there's actually a big difference and many people don't pick up on it.
That is because you consort with an educated class of individuals that are of means.but I believe that people naturally infer the caveats
so, what? you need to make your petty correction because....you're outThat is because you consort with an educated class of individuals that are of means.
Hottest and driest ever was probably more than 4 billion years ago. I say you could have let that one go, but what do I know.Right?
I'm glad you grasp the significance of "since records started"
vs
"hottest/driest/wettest/coldest etc. ever" - most of the general public doesn't.
I am skeptical of the alarmist's certainty with respect to the degree to which human activity influences the clear warming trend. But, to quote Elon Musk, "why run this crazy experiment" on planet earth? Its too dangerous. We should pivot. Given the facts, the rational/conservative response should be to play it safe - reduce and reuse in order to curtail pollution. The rational/liberal conclusion should be to innovate and make changes to curtail pollution.We're in a clear warming trend.
The Greenhouse Effect exists.
Greenhouse Gases exist.
Human activity results in increased Greenhouse Gases.
No.so, what? you need to make your petty correction because....you're out
to make sure that the uneducated class of individuals on this forum who
are not of means have an ultra clear grasp of the point that mundus was
making in refutation of your logically fallacious thread?
No.are we having a bad day, casa?
You'll find lots of info here Caca.Link?
More bike lanes too.If we as Americans and Europeans pay more for everything that will be sure to fix the climate while the shitholes catch up!
We've got this all figured out
Absolutely. We need at least 8:1 bike lane to car lane ratioMore bike lanes too.
Remove regular lanes of traffic to create them.
I think I might be able to get in somewhere around 1000 feet of hill climbing during my morning commute. Still trying to figure out how I'll eat and sleep though.
Holy sh!t. We were just joking here and lookMore bike lanes too.
Remove regular lanes of traffic to create them.
I think I might be able to get in somewhere around 1000 feet of hill climbing during my morning commute. Still trying to figure out how I'll eat and sleep though.
But our planet is way older than that, why just 12000? We were once a ball of bubbling magma... so if we are suddenly engulfed in lava you'll know it has nothing to do with Climate change... it's just the earth going in cycles.I wish someone could explain why we act as if temperature documentation from the past 100 years is basically representative of the past 12,000 years.
nobody worth their salt drives market anywho....it's had restrictedHoly sh!t. We were just joking here and look
San Francisco just days away from a car-free Market Street
However, cars will still be able to cross over Market Street.www.kron4.com