REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Wrong. Just like any employer leaving a defense company or classified program. You get debriefed and you have no privy to information.Wrong again ding dong. Trump today still maintains clearance. Believe it or not ex presidents and or their staff still engage in classified conversations all the time. This gives subsequent administrations a valuable contact to figure out what happened or what they saw at a previous event or time that drove a decision or an outcome. Ex presidents also name staff members that will continue to have access to all documents at the archives once they are out of office.
You still didn't answer the question. You said only the person who classifies a document can un-classify it. What if that person dies, genius?
Yep.Wrong. Just like any employer leaving a defense company or classified program. You get debriefed and you have no privy to information.
The classification comes from the security agency.
What a simpleton.
Wrong. Just like any employer leaving a defense company or classified program. You get debriefed and you have no privy to information.
The classification comes from the security agency.
What a simpleton.
incoherent as usual, squidliar!Wrong. Sandy Berger (Burglar) was a Bill Clinton staffer. Burger got convicted of twice removing secure documents from the national archives as Clinton was leaving office. Burger stuffed the documents into his pants, and walked out.
Burger's sentence was to do a bunch of community service, and to forfeit his Washington security clearance for three years. The sentence was a slap on the wrist and a slap in the face of justice. However, it showed that all outgoing administration personnel have Washington security clearances.
.
You're confusing Trumby conspiracy theories and left wing hoaxes with reality. Meanwhile you don't have the single ounce of dignity it would take to call out the obvious corruption of the Bidens.Open, in plain sight corruption and it was ignored and outright defended by the Trumpers here.
Well This is awkward.You're confusing Trumby conspiracy theories and left wing hoaxes with reality. Meanwhile you don't have the single ounce of dignity it would take to call out the obvious corruption of the Bidens.
incoherent as usual, squidliar!
Berger removed the documents after he was out of office
Berger, unlike Trump, still had security clearances
Trump was not authorized to possess any of the documents in question
that's not what I said...I see, so an ex-staffer is authorized to possess presidential papers, but an ex-president is not.
Incoherent?
.
there is a process for declassifying that requires the sign off of the relevant agency(/ies); there is currently no indication that this motion was ever taken
Biden did the same thing as Sandy Berger and foaf is defending it.Vice presidents have no such authority.
yes but presidents can declassify something just by thinking about it.
There's even another layer to this vice president document declassification argument. It comes out the same. Vice presidents have no document declassification authority.
.
yes but presidents can declassify something just by thinking about it
omg...Berger still had the clearance to view them, NOT TO TAKE THEM OUT OF THE BUILDINGI see, so an ex-staffer is authorized to possess presidential papers, but an ex-president is not.
Incoherent?
.
please point to where I defended any of thisBiden did the same thing as Sandy Berger and foaf is defending it.