Lt Colonel Vindman and CIA agent Eric Ciaramella

Mike_Jones

Phil Edwards status
Mar 5, 2009
5,992
114
63
.
Vindman was a member of Obama's, then Trump's, National Security Council. During a secret committee session Vindman testified that Trump's Ukraine call transcript lied about what Trump said to Ukraine's president. So far during open questioning Vindman has downplayed such claims.

In today's open session one question and answer session shed light on Vindman's motive for his closed-session testimony. Rep. Nunes' questioned Vindman as to whether he had discussed his testimony with anyone in the intelligence community. Vindman answered that he could not answer that question without outing the whistleblower.

How is this not an admission that Vindman coordinated this Trump attack with agent Ciaramella?
.
 
Last edited:

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
26,170
633
113
his first paragraph mischaracterizes his testimony in committee

more squidley lies
 
  • Like
Reactions: mundus

2surf

Tom Curren status
Apr 12, 2004
12,711
42
48
California USA
Vindman testified today the notion of him becoming Ukraine’s SecDef “is rather comical,” but that seemed to describe his reaction more so than the intent of the person who made the offer, Oleksander Danylyuk. Vindman thought it was goofy because he’s an American, not a Ukrainian, and because a lieutenant colonel isn’t a high enough ranking officer that one would normally consider him for a job as powerful as defense secretary of a foreign country. He also said of Danylyuk, “I’m not sure if he meant it as a joke or not.” But he took the offer seriously enough that he “dismissed” it, and considered it something that he needed to report to his superiors. Plus, he said it was made three times. That’s a lot of repetition for a “joke.”
 

Uberkuque

Nep status
Nov 19, 2014
593
92
28
.
Vindman was a member of Obama's, then Trump's, National Security Council. During a secret committee session Vindman testified that Trump's Ukraine call transcript lied about what Trump said to Ukraine's president. So far during open questioning Vindman has downplayed such claims.

In today's open session one question and answer session shed light on Vindman's motive for his closed-session testimony. Rep. Nunes' questioned Vindman as to whether he had discussed his testimony with anyone in the intelligence community. Vindman answered that he could not answer that question without outing the whistleblower.

How is this not an admission that Vindman coordinated this Trump attack with agent Ciaramella?
.
Who cares. Trump is guilty AF. End of story. Anything else is a worthless distraction.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Ifallalot