Believe me when I say that this is not the least bit surprising.
My bad, I didn't read the fine print under the title in your graphic that said it was a 3 month period
Is that really the best gotcha you have? Either way it changes nothing about what I said. The top podcasts have millions of subscribers/downloads/listens on a monthly basis, and in some cases weekly.
Triton shows ranking by downloads and “users”, both of which look practically the same. It’s not apparent how they measure users.
Many people listen to podcast episodes without downloading them and/or being subscribers. That would be my best guess. They are tracing it to a specific IP/device. If you read the fine print I'm pretty sure they lay it out for you. Go ahead- doesn't really change my point above.
Even if the methodology isn't perfect, if the methodology is consistent across everything that is ranked then it still gives you a good idea of what is going on.
Anyway, I can only assume that the huge disparity between ranking chart websites is due to them not using the same list of networks, them not using the same sets of data, in other words.
Yes, this would make sense. The list with Bongino is Cumulus. I don't know the various providers or aggregators and who they cater to.
Downloads only tells you how many downloads.
People tend not to download episodes that they have no intention of listening to because it clogs up your playlist. At the very least, someone has to be interested enough to actually subscribe or at least download an episode, which gives you an idea of the popularity.
I don’t know exactly what information was taken in the survey or how accurately it represents actual consumption. Should I be like you and just assume it’s flawed?
Uh, again- where did I say it was flawed?
I've cleared this up several times now. Your reading comprehension really needs work. What I've said, for the 3rd or 4th time, is that 5000 interviewees is a drop in the bucket compared to how many people listen to podcasts, and with the latter we have actual download numbers. That's like saying that the election results (downloads) are flawed because they don't match the polls (survey of 5000)
Juicing Bongino for political reason?
Bongino himself is clearly in it for the money, honey. You are so adorable!
UH, no. That was based on your comment not mine. You made this comment:
"There's certainly an incentive for skewing a ratings chart one way or the other, obviously."
Which makes it sound like you think that the rating/download chart gave Bongino a better rating for political reasons. If that's not what you meant, then fine.
Holy fook dude . . . .