REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
KS gets all political and sh!t.
- Thread starter bonzer5fin
- Start date
Lets think that all the way trough...Driftcoast said:
You're assuming conventional explosives were used...vs. what could have been used...military grade...more like cutting charges...which are purported to make much less noise when set off. And you're assuming it takes fire to set them off. Also...placement just below the damage and fires zones would likely due the trick. And...many first hand witnesses did report explosions....some are even recorded.
If you dig you'll realize the whole of the evidence fits demo much more precisely than fire induced collapse...and the physics of motion proves it. Black and white.
What's the point?
Do you enjoy being lied too?
Is truth important in our society?
But why the overemphasis on this conspiracy?Bohter said:
What about the other lies you are neglecting? Are you not guilty of the same neglect as those you are trying to enlighten?
Shouldn't you be warning the people about them?
It's a corrupt world.
I've got a friend who, when he hits the bottle a little too hard, tends to go on rants with the main point being "question everything." He then proceeds to send me links to articles supporting his point of view from extremely questionable sources using extremely questionable logic.Autoprax said:
And you are making an ass out of you and me too?Bohter said:
Assumptions all around!
More assumptions! Yours must be better than mine!
More excellent flying skill assumptions!
No collapse video sounds like any of those known controlled demos Doofenstein posted.
Fire swells joints, rivets/bolts pop, metal sag, , building falls on itself. Easy peasy, no scalar weapons needed. Motion should always look same under known physics. Cause is what we argue about, not collapse physics.
Truth is one person, or a few, can cause change. Doesn't need to come form top to down, aka, the usual power structure.
Can't believe that moron bohter and this thread are still going.
He's persistent I'll give him that
But that's about it
He's persistent I'll give him that
But that's about it
"Cause is what we argue about, not collapse physics."
Wrong. The case I've presented here...my debunk of the debunker, deals with cause & collapse physics. The motion of the actual collapse does not fit a gravity induced collapse. It (and the weightless salmon) can only be explained by demo.
Only NIST stopped their investigation at cause....conveniently leaving "the elephant in the room" out of their report initially. And it's a big one.
Oh..and that AIA Convention vote on Resolution 16-3? Failed...but 11% of over 4000 Architects voted in support. Ah well...at least some recognize a fish story when they see it.
Speaking of fish...where's the salmon levitating in the elevator Mr Janitor?!
Wrong. The case I've presented here...my debunk of the debunker, deals with cause & collapse physics. The motion of the actual collapse does not fit a gravity induced collapse. It (and the weightless salmon) can only be explained by demo.
Only NIST stopped their investigation at cause....conveniently leaving "the elephant in the room" out of their report initially. And it's a big one.
Oh..and that AIA Convention vote on Resolution 16-3? Failed...but 11% of over 4000 Architects voted in support. Ah well...at least some recognize a fish story when they see it.
Speaking of fish...where's the salmon levitating in the elevator Mr Janitor?!
your debunking analogies seem pretty thin to me, especially the drinking straw bit? I thought we'd settled on a cardboard tube that we launch a lawn dart through, then set on fire and drop a King Salmon on? GWS did extensive work on this. Now we have to go with a crumpled straw? To keep things to scale I guess we have to shoot a pellet through the straw, set it on fire and then drop some lox on the thing? Maybe we can use this as a strawman to work from:
That is a cute photo...but it's not the requested salmon floating weightless in an elevator while it accelrates constantly downward.the janitor said:your debunking analogies seem pretty thin to me, especially the drinking straw bit? I thought we'd settled on a cardboard tube that we launch a lawn dart through, then set on fire and drop a King Salmon on? GWS did extensive work on this. Now we have to go with a crumpled straw? To keep things to scale I guess we have to shoot a pellet through the straw, set it on fire and then drop some lox on the thing? Maybe we can use this as a strawman to work from:
Also, your reading comprehension is off a bit me thinks.
I don't claim the straw analogy...it was used by the debunker article's author.
You seem incapable of a genuine discussion of the collapse physics...maybe you are one of the guys who left the room when Hitler told those who flunked high school science, math & physics to split?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EbRc1BhXjvA
" Why the overemphasis....?" Not really any "overemphasis", just that this "event" on that day, is the... "Litmus Test".... if you will, and quite a big one at that.
" What about the other lies...? " So are you stating there are "other lies" ? Which ones?
I know there are a lot, but maybe you might able to think of a few other big ones that you might consider to be lies that should not be "neglected". Then we can all "warn" those who might need it.
"It's a corrupt world" This is getting closer the core of the matter. How corrupt is it?
When you see through the lies and get to even a partial understanding of what is really going on, then one begins to see how.... "beyond" corrupt, things are. Certainly, not the
most pleasant thing(s) to think about, however, this reality must be faced.
You can "think about your thinking".....but not at the exclusion of the truth.....
I am goingoutside now....there is no surf over here now....but it's good to paddle around
and get some exercise....and be ready....
" What about the other lies...? " So are you stating there are "other lies" ? Which ones?
I know there are a lot, but maybe you might able to think of a few other big ones that you might consider to be lies that should not be "neglected". Then we can all "warn" those who might need it.
"It's a corrupt world" This is getting closer the core of the matter. How corrupt is it?
When you see through the lies and get to even a partial understanding of what is really going on, then one begins to see how.... "beyond" corrupt, things are. Certainly, not the
most pleasant thing(s) to think about, however, this reality must be faced.
You can "think about your thinking".....but not at the exclusion of the truth.....
I am goingoutside now....there is no surf over here now....but it's good to paddle around
and get some exercise....and be ready....
Well, I guess we just see things differently.
If you'd seen some of the things that I have seen you see things differently too.
I suspect that my understanding of the corruptness of the world is as profound as yours.
We just react to this understanding differently.
You've taken to warning strangers on a surfing website about a specific corrupt event.
If you'd seen some of the things that I have seen you see things differently too.
I suspect that my understanding of the corruptness of the world is as profound as yours.
We just react to this understanding differently.
You've taken to warning strangers on a surfing website about a specific corrupt event.
Lots of folks still reading this "dead horse thread"...
If you're interested, the following link is to an article written by a Mechanical Engineer who found critical errors in a highly regarded Official Story supporting paper...and is related to the Missing Jolt paper's analysis.
http://www.ae911truth.org/news/265-news-media-events-mechanical-engineer-sends-open-letter.html
Within this article is a link to more details...
http://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/2014-Sep-Letter-Szamboti-Johns.pdf
If you're an engineer it's pretty easy to follow...if not....maybe you have a friend who is.
Cheers.
If you're interested, the following link is to an article written by a Mechanical Engineer who found critical errors in a highly regarded Official Story supporting paper...and is related to the Missing Jolt paper's analysis.
http://www.ae911truth.org/news/265-news-media-events-mechanical-engineer-sends-open-letter.html
Within this article is a link to more details...
http://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/2014-Sep-Letter-Szamboti-Johns.pdf
If you're an engineer it's pretty easy to follow...if not....maybe you have a friend who is.
Cheers.