REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
It's ok, there are just a few people at the Nazi Rallies
- Thread starter StuAzole
- Start date
The original statement was in reference to the individuals being treated like criminals, not to their various support structures, if any.casa_mugrienta said:Totally disagree.GDaddy said:Agree completely.StuAzole said:Nope - I'm all good admitting that exists too. What I'd like to see is people treat the "normal white guy" killers like their "radical islamic guy" counterparts. They're all dangerous.casa_mugrienta said:R u skeered of neoNazis like yer skeered of Trump Derangment Disorder too!!!?? :blush:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/homepage2/james-hodgkinson-profile/index.html
(CNN)James T. Hodgkinson, the man identified as shooting a Republican member of congress and four others on Wednesday morning, was a small business owner in Illinois who defined himself publicly by his firm support of Bernie Sanders' progressive politics -- and his hatred of conservatives and President Donald Trump.
Of course they're all dangerous. They can kill you.
But to claim you should treat them the same is illogical.
The motivations driving Islamic terrorism are vastly different than wacko white guy shooters. Unless they're wacko whiteguy jihadists.
The support for wacko white guy shooters is minuscule. Islamic terrorism on the other hand has a fair number of professed supporters.
It's like comparing a driveby shooting to Sandy Hook. Not even comparable.
When the KKK provides how-to instruction, funding and tells their fans to strike out at blacks and subsequently claims that as their own operation then that's getting closer to the islamists' declared war on the west. At that point nobody is going to disagree that we need to take action against those groups.
It's all on line. Every word of it. The only difference between the KKK and ISIS is that the KKK doesn't claim its actors in quite the same way. That said, the "she had it coming" claims after Charlottesville aren't that far off.GDaddy said:The original statement was in reference to the individuals being treated like criminals, not to their various support structures, if any.casa_mugrienta said:Totally disagree.GDaddy said:Agree completely.StuAzole said:Nope - I'm all good admitting that exists too. What I'd like to see is people treat the "normal white guy" killers like their "radical islamic guy" counterparts. They're all dangerous.casa_mugrienta said:R u skeered of neoNazis like yer skeered of Trump Derangment Disorder too!!!?? :blush:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/06/14/homepage2/james-hodgkinson-profile/index.html
(CNN)James T. Hodgkinson, the man identified as shooting a Republican member of congress and four others on Wednesday morning, was a small business owner in Illinois who defined himself publicly by his firm support of Bernie Sanders' progressive politics -- and his hatred of conservatives and President Donald Trump.
Of course they're all dangerous. They can kill you.
But to claim you should treat them the same is illogical.
The motivations driving Islamic terrorism are vastly different than wacko white guy shooters. Unless they're wacko whiteguy jihadists.
The support for wacko white guy shooters is minuscule. Islamic terrorism on the other hand has a fair number of professed supporters.
It's like comparing a driveby shooting to Sandy Hook. Not even comparable.
When the KKK provides how-to instruction, funding and tells their fans to strike out at blacks and subsequently claims that as their own operation then that's getting closer to the islamists' declared war on the west. At that point nobody is going to disagree that we need to take action against those groups.
It's funny though - it sounds like GDaddy thinks ISIS sits around in an office managing an entire globe of terror.
So do you have any evidence of an organized campaign of violence by whites against blacks or are you just fabricating that implication out of thin air?
You can see what the ratios of back-on-white murders are vs white-on-black. And those are just the gross numbers - the RATES those numbers indicate to for these vastly different sized population groups are even more lopsided.
Unlike what you're talking about, the statistics for black-on-white crime indicate to an actual problem.
Isn't the current buzzword for that "microagressions"?
Whatevs. If the activists actually want to force whitey to get into the all-race-all-the-time frame of mind then I guess there's no way to avoid that. I just hope their ability to deal with the outcome is better than their ability to see it.
Whatevs. If the activists actually want to force whitey to get into the all-race-all-the-time frame of mind then I guess there's no way to avoid that. I just hope their ability to deal with the outcome is better than their ability to see it.
Conflating political violence with generic criminality might be meaningful to you but not to me. When someone's goal is to force all of society to bend to their politics that transcends a simple "I want your cash".StuAzole said:
We are not legally or morally compelled to knowingly grow an existing problem larger.