REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Inflation
- Thread starter PRCD
- Start date
Thanks for wasting all the quarters by firing them at the asses of grossly overweight strippers.
M
manbearpig
Guest
Source
The current clad version is two layers of cupronickel, 75% copper and 25% nickel, on a core of pure copper.[3] The total composition of the coin is 8.33% nickel, with the remainder copper. It weighs 0.2000 avoirdupois oz, 1/80 of a pound, 0.1823 troy oz, (5.670 grams). The diameter is 0.955 inches (24.26 mm), and the width of 0.069 inches (1.75 mm). The coin has a 0.069-inch (1.75 mm) reeded (or milled) edge.[4] Owing to the introduction of the clad quarter in 1965, it was occasionally called a "Johnson Sandwich" after Lyndon B. Johnson, the US President at the time.[5] As of 2011, it cost 11.14 cents to produce each coin.[6] The U.S. Mint began producing silver quarters again in 1992 for inclusion in the annual Silver Proof set. Early quarters (before 1828) were slightly larger in diameter and thinner than the current coin.
The current regular issue coin is the Washington quarter, featuring George Washington on the obverse. The reverse featured an eagle prior to the 1999 50 State Quarters Program. The Washington quarter was designed by John Flanagan. It was initially issued as a circulating commemorative, but was made a regular issue coin in 1934.
In 1999, the 50 State quarters program of circulating commemorative quarters began. These have a modified Washington obverse and a different reverse for each state, ending the former Washington quarter's production completely.[7] On January 23, 2007, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 392 extending the state quarter program one year to 2009, to include the District of Columbia and the five inhabited US territories: Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The bill passed through the Senate and was signed into legislation by President George W. Bush as part of Pub.L. 110–161: the Consolidated Appropriations Act (text) (pdf), on December 27, 2007.[8][9] The typeface used in the state quarter series varies a bit from one state to another, but is generally derived from Albertus.
On June 4, 2008, a bill titled America's Beautiful National Parks Quarter Dollar Coin Act of 2008, H.R. 6184, was introduced to the House of Representatives. On December 23, 2008, President Bush signed the bill into law as Pub.L. 110–456 (text) (pdf). The America the Beautiful quarters program began in 2010 and will continue for 12 years.[10]
Interview with "Dying of Money" Author, Jens O. Parsson
The Dying of Money, written under the pen name Jens O. Parsson, is perhaps the best explanation ever written on the process by which inflation works through markets and the economy. Considered a “Must Read” by Jim Puplava and regularly quoted by him on the Financial Sense Newshour, it is our...
www.financialsense.com
Didn’t I post a thread about this about a year ago and everyone said that’s un-possible?
Last edited:
The REITs and other large entities already have already made a ton. See: The Great Reset. It's a book now.
We're seeing a consistency, honesty, and messaging problem across government agencies. The Fed wasn't worried about inflation, now they are. The virus did not come from a lab, well maybe it did.
When the press is using your worst photos, they're obviously making you look like a dunce:
this is one of the cheapest and most insidious practices in modern journalism and
yet another indicator that they are just hamming it for the clicks
it's shameful
This is from January.
U.S. intel agencies still haven’t ruled out lab accident origin for Covid
U.S. officials haven't shown any evidence pointing to a lab escape, and scientists call the scenario unlikely. The U.S. wants China to share information.
I'm looking for where it was reported that they knew the source was from a wet market and for sure it wasn't from the lab.
The funny thing is they still don't know.
Did anyone ever say for sure they knew?
They do the same things to black guys who got shot by cops but in reverse.
It's a photo of their 7th b-day.
I'd go back through St. Fauci's, Marc Lipsitch's, and David Gorski's comments over the past year and the WHO report and draw your own conclusions. That'll give you a good perspective on the messaging from our Betters. Either way, they could've just been lying:This is from January.
U.S. intel agencies still haven’t ruled out lab accident origin for Covid
U.S. officials haven't shown any evidence pointing to a lab escape, and scientists call the scenario unlikely. The U.S. wants China to share information.www.nbcnews.com
I'm looking for where it was reported that they knew the source was from a wet market and for sure it wasn't from the lab.
The funny thing is they still don't know.
Did anyone ever say for sure they knew?
The Sudden Rise of the Coronavirus Lab-Leak Theory
Scientists and political commentators are no longer dismissing the possibility that COVID-19 emerged from a Chinese laboratory. What changed?
That seems like a backpedal. The usual suspects were hammering us with the media-driven talking points about there being no evidence of lab origin last year. I think you should direct your research to statements from a year ago, not CYA now. I posted this a couple of months ago:The Sudden Rise of the Coronavirus Lab-Leak Theory
Scientists and political commentators are no longer dismissing the possibility that COVID-19 emerged from a Chinese laboratory. What changed?www.newyorker.com
In 2018, Diplomats Warned of Risky Coronavirus Experiments in a Wuhan Lab. No One Listened.
After seeing a risky lab, they wrote a cable warning to Washington. But it was ignored.
www.politico.com
We're investigating (April 2020):
US explores possibility that coronavirus spread started in Chinese lab, not a market
US intelligence and national security officials say the United States government is looking into the possibility that the novel coronavirus spread from a Chinese laboratory rather than a market, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter who caution it is premature to draw any...
www.cnn.com
US Looks at Wuhan Lab Theory , China Researcher Says Allegations Malicious
The vice director of the Wuhan Institute of Virology spoke out to defend the Wuhan biosafety lab from allegations the coronavirus was created by the Chinese scientists.
www.newsweek.com
A US researcher who worked with a Wuhan virology lab gives 4 reasons why a coronavirus leak would be extremely unlikely
A fringe theory posits that the coronavirus accidentally leaked from a Wuhan lab. But a US researcher says there's no evidence for that.
www.businessinsider.com
Fact check: Coronavirus not man-made or engineered but its origin remains unclear
Suggestions that coronavirus was manmade or engineered for use in Chinese bioweapons are false. Beyond that, conclusions can't be drawn on its origin.
www.usatoday.com
Natural spillover or research lab leak? Why a credible investigation is needed to determine the origin of the coronavirus pandemic
Could the COVID-19 pandemic have started with a lab accident? While the matter has become heavily politicized, a credible investigation could help clear things up.
thebulletin.org
Did the coronavirus escape from a Chinese lab? Here's what we know
Experts say animal-to-human transmission is far more likely, but some circumstantial evidence suggests it's possible it was accidentally released by a lab.
Was the coronavirus made in a Wuhan lab? Here’s what the genetic evidence shows
Despite President Trump's statements that the coronavirus was released from a laboratory in Wuhan, scientists say the evidence points to a natural origin.
www.latimes.com
“The Discussion Is Basically Over”: Why Scientists Believe the Wuhan-Lab Coronavirus Origin Theory Is Highly Unlikely
Trump and Mike Pompeo’s favorite blame-China theory makes great propaganda—but dubious science.
Report says data suggests shutdown at China lab, but experts skeptical
U.S. and U.K. intel agencies are reviewing the private report, but intel analysts examined and couldn't confirm a similar theory previously.
‘Pure Fabrication’: Wuhan Lab Director Rejects Theory That Coronavirus Leaked From Facility
“How could it have leaked from our lab when we never had it?”
www.forbes.com
Interesting how hard it is to find news from a year ago.
"Pure Fabrication" (paywalled, late May 2020):
Yeah, I saw that one too.
But was that coming from the FEDs?
I'm not disagreeing.
Yeah, I saw that one too.
But was that coming from the FEDs?
I'm not disagreeing.
It's a conspiracy theory (2020) + backpedaling (2021):
The conspiracy theories about the origins of the coronavirus, debunked
There’s a rumor the coronavirus started in a Chinese lab. And evidence from scientists to the contrary.
In case you haven't noticed, the FEDs are not good for a whole lot. Some of us have seen the sausage made.
Fauci: No scientific evidence the coronavirus was made in a Chinese lab
In an exclusive interview, the face of America’s COVID-19 response cautions against the rush for states to reopen, and offers his tips for handling the pandemic's information deluge.
www.nationalgeographic.com