REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I guess we can count on you to fly no more!I'll take it one farther and say, "No one who bitches about climate change should ever be allowed to step within 100 yards of any commercial or private jet".
View attachment 186183
Gonna make those surf trips to PR just a little tougher.I'll take it one farther and say, "No one who bitches about climate change should ever be allowed to step within 100 yards of any commercial or private jet".
View attachment 186183
Record-breaking snowfall reported at Philadelphia International Airport during July heatwave
The Philadelphia/Mount Holly office of the National Weather Service logged the total daily snowfall over the Pennsylvania airport that afternoon — and noted that it broke the old record for J…nypost.com
Just like everything else Flying is OK for him. Hypocrisy on any and all subjects.I guess we can count on you to fly no more!
Would you consider a Nuclear winter to be an example of man made climate change?
It would be a temporary bump in the road. Earth would recover quite nicely with or without us.Would you consider a Nuclear winter to be an example of man made climate change?
That was in direct response to Hump's post above mine which cited local wildfires as if they are climate change. Lower temps in July in Nebraska are just as valid as local wildfires in British Columbia.You always talk about how the historical record is such a small insignificant sampling...then you post two months of data, in a small geographically area, to prove your point?
Year after year records are broken but nothing is happening, amirite?That was in direct response to Hump's post above mine which cited local wildfires as if they are climate change. Lower temps in July in Nebraska are just as valid as local wildfires in British Columbia.
Note the 2022 Tonga volcano eruption as an outlier and use a longer timespan.Year after year records are broken ut nothing is happening, amirite?
'A fire year': California wildfires have burned more than 20 times as much land as last year
California's fire season is off to a fierce start. Here’s the latest on the season to date, including the nearly 20 fires burning in the state.www.latimes.com
Small sample size. Why are you guys so bad at math and statistics?Year after year records are broken ut nothing is happening, amirite?
'A fire year': California wildfires have burned more than 20 times as much land as last year
California's fire season is off to a fierce start. Here’s the latest on the season to date, including the nearly 20 fires burning in the state.www.latimes.com
Your viewpoints are valid, but correlation is not causation.Face it guys, the climate is coming to get you and there isn't a damned thing you can do about it either. You're doomed!!!!! Doomed I tell ya!!!!
Hottest, yes, but only as it is relative to the last 150 years. There are no records before the period of 1850-1900, so this comparison of "hottest" means absolutely nothing in the context of geologic time—4.6 billion years of Earth's existence. To put that in context, this fearmongering represents approximately 0.00000326% of the time the Earth has existed. It's idiotic for humans to baseline our modern era, as it isn't even a fart in the wind in terms of time. Soft versus hard science.
It's simpler than this - they just compressed the color scale.Hottest, yes, but only as it is relative to the last 150 years. There are no records before the period of 1850-1900, so this comparison of "hottest" means absolutely nothing in the context of geologic time—4.6 billion years of Earth's existence. To put that in context, this fearmongering represents approximately 0.00000326% of the time the Earth has existed. It's idiotic for humans to baseline our modern era, as it isn't even a fart in the wind in terms of time. Soft versus hard science.