REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Gavin will own your home now
- Thread starter Ifallalot
- Start date
I'm sorry this happened to you after pulling up stakes for Sahara West.
Not quite.
"The money would come from a yet-unspecified revolving fund set up by the state, with shares sold to investors. As home values increase, so would the value of the shares."
Once again the “progressive” Democrat Industrial Complex invents a new and ingenious way to vaporize other peoples money.
We're talking houses not boats.
And speaking of which, how much equity do you have in your mother's basement? 3 rattraps? 5? Maybe 7 total?
The former has been going on for decades. I wouldn't worry so much about standard commercial (i.e., no drycleaners) being converted but industrial properties being converted with minimal, if any, cleanup or mitigation of any kind. How the Treasure Island and Hunter's Point development companies haven't been class-action sued into the multi-billions is mind-boggling.
If you're thinking about buying a house in a brand-new development in an urban area, think long and hard about what was there before and do some due diligence. It should be absolutely mandatory for real estate agents to divulge any and all environmental issues not just on the actual property but also within a certain radius depending on the type of property.
Nah, he just won't see the temperature drop below 100 for the next several months and he's crotchety. Surf forecast doesn't look too promising either; very low tide.
Wall Street isn't Dem or Rep. Financial products come from lobbyists and campaign contributions to both sides.
Another step closer
fox5sandiego.com
Newsom signs bills allowing multi-family housing in single-family zones
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law two housing bills allowing denser housing on single-family lots, which proponents say will help alleviate the housing crisis in California but opponents worry will…
fox5sandiego.com
LMAO I'm so old I remember when it was the Democrats in favor of regulations preventing home ownership. Here regulations get cut, and the vaginal discharge is predictable: from some right-leaning nimbys.Another step closer
Newsom signs bills allowing multi-family housing in single-family zones
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law two housing bills allowing denser housing on single-family lots, which proponents say will help alleviate the housing crisis in California but opponents worry will…
Also regarding the OP, to me, this is a shitty idea if it's for any home purchase and not for only legal citizens/residents who don't currently own a home anywhere in the US.
Otherwise, it's just going to tack on 45% to the Blackrock/residential-real-estate-as-monthly-recurring-revenue-generating-asset price.
Otherwise, it's just going to tack on 45% to the Blackrock/residential-real-estate-as-monthly-recurring-revenue-generating-asset price.
The bill allowing multiple families in single family homes from laidback's post, which I was responding to?
It's a deregulation, obviously. If previously, only one family could live somewhere by law, but now, multiple families can live somewhere by law, the regulations have been decreased.
The suggestion that the state throws in and owns 45% in your OP?
That's an increase in government participation and without some heavy restrictions on who is eligible for Sacramento Sugar, I highly doubt it will help poorer Californians.