G7 to be held at Trump resort

utoma

Nep status
Apr 19, 2019
677
134
43
But they'll make up in their mind that the left wants to jail people over speech.
 

mundus

Phil Edwards status
Feb 26, 2018
7,586
273
83
My apologies, posted same thread. Notice the crickets in both of them from the Trumptards?
 

mundus

Phil Edwards status
Feb 26, 2018
7,586
273
83
Open self dealing to bail out Trumps failing business, the new normal, thanks Trumptards.
 

SteveT

Miki Dora status
Apr 11, 2005
4,432
14
38
So what if he hosts it, I don't see a problem.
UNTIL... We see the bill the tax paying citizens of the U.S. have to foot while lining Cheeto's pockets.
Then there's a BIG problem.
 

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
37,420
477
83
The Californias
What's the problem? Would you like it to be held at a resort owned by a different billionaire? Would that make you feel better?
What’s the problem with president using his position of power to enrich himself with taxpayer’s money?

And you’re worried about poor people on welfare that you have to pay for.

yes, a different billionaire would be preferable, dummy.
 

GromsDad

Duke status
Jan 21, 2014
22,730
376
83
West of the Atlantic. East of the ICW.
What’s the problem with president using his position of power to enrich himself with taxpayer’s money?

And you’re worried about poor people on welfare that you have to pay for.

yes, a different billionaire would be preferable, dummy.
You're delusional. You really think holding a small function at a property that the president owns is "enriching" himself. Get a freaking grip. The guy was enriched decades ago and it had nothing to do with being president. For all you screeching morons know he may even be saving the taxpayers money by holding it there instead of elsewhere. Orangeman bad though and all that happy horseshit. Go scream at the sky dummy.
 

FecalFace

Duke status
Nov 21, 2008
37,420
477
83
The Californias
You're delusional. You really think holding a small function at a property that the president owns is "enriching" himself. Get a freaking grip. The guy was enriched decades ago and it had nothing to do with being president. For all you screeching morons know he may even be saving the taxpayers money by holding it there instead of elsewhere. Orangeman bad though and all that happy horseshit. Go scream at the sky dummy.
ethics, look it up.

“small function” LOLS

“saving taxpayer money” by putting it in his pocket. LololololoL
 

GromsDad

Duke status
Jan 21, 2014
22,730
376
83
West of the Atlantic. East of the ICW.
ethics, look it up.

“small function” LOLS

“saving taxpayer money” by putting it in his pocket. LololololoL
You're simply assuming there is an ethics issue without facts.

Yes, in the grander scheme of things for a golf resort like Doral it is a small function. Attend a major PGA event that a place like Doral hosts and you'll see the difference.

By putting it in his pocket???? You have any facts on that? The guy hasn't even taken a salary. How do you know he's pocketing a dime? You don't. You're a partisan hack and a miserable dummy.
 

Phi1

Miki Dora status
May 21, 2002
3,745
71
48
Hell Cajon, Ca
Jimmy Carter really effed up. He should have held on to his peanut farm. Then had the USDA recommend 6 servings of peanuts a day. And require diesel fuel be a blend of peanut oil. And have Iran investigate Reagan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woke AF

Phi1

Miki Dora status
May 21, 2002
3,745
71
48
Hell Cajon, Ca
This is basic $hit every government employee has to follow. It's not complicated.

The public may lose confidence in the integrity of Government if it perceives that an employee's Government work is influenced by personal interests or by payments from an outside source. An executive branch employee's Government work may have the potential to benefit the employee personally, affect the financial interests of the employee's family, or involve individuals or organizations with which the employee has some past, present, or future connection away from the employee's Government job. Separately, an employee might be offered a payment from a non-Federal source, such as a former employer, either before or after entering Government. Accordingly:

  • An employee may be disqualified from working on a particular Government matter.
  • An employee may be prohibited from holding specified property.
  • An employee may be prohibited from accepting a payment from a non-Federal source.
 

utoma

Nep status
Apr 19, 2019
677
134
43
Have it at Camp David, like the last summit in the USA.

Also. Trump HAS taken a salary, you idiot. He chooses to donate it (maybe more tax write offs?), but the whole premise of giving the president a salary is so he can be focused on putting the nation first, but instead he's focused on enriching himself.

 

utoma

Nep status
Apr 19, 2019
677
134
43
Here's more spending by Trump on Trump property for Trump enrichment:

Several analyses have calculated that Trump, as of October 2019, incurred around $109 million in taxpayer spending related to his golf outings, which is close to the amount of money a president would make if he were being paid $400,000 annually for 278.5 years.

By the way. Most of this Golf outing money is going into his properties. Acutal GAO official document:

 
  • Like
Reactions: FecalFace and Phi1