FDA just lost a historic ivermectin lawsuit

kpd73

Nep status
Apr 5, 2014
755
931
93
Generic, super cheap. Not a real money maker at all.

Covid shots on the other hand, paid for by taxpayers, mandated use, multiple rounds of “boosters” shielded completely from liability.

Cha-motherfucking-Ching.
Biggest thing EVERYONE is forgetting is that the Vaccine was approved under the Emergency Use Authorization

.

"Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was the first mRNA vaccine which was authorized by the food and drug administration (FDA) for emergency use and made available under the emergency use authorization (EUA) as a two-dose vaccine for primary protection."

One of the main criteria for Emergency Use Authorization is.....

An EUA can only be granted when no adequate, approved, available alternatives exist, and when the known and potential benefits outweigh the potential risks. An EUA also only lasts as long as the public health emergency for which it was declared.

That's the Biggest reason why Any and Every voice suggesting or recommending something that was proven to show efficacy was shouted down or silenced.
The MRNA Vaccine hadn't been approved yet and showing that might be Any kind of evidence for an alternative treatment would have been a fvckin Disaster $$$$$ for the conductors of this orchestra.
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,728
2,519
113
Mikey J, it you want to be taken seriously, you can't be posting trash articles from a sh!t website.

Did this decision happen or not?

If it happened (it happened), and your vaunted leftist outlets refused to report it, then what does that say about you and your opinion of what constitutes valid sources?
.
 

kidfury

Duke status
Oct 14, 2017
25,144
10,848
113

The author is selling this
 

One-Off

Tom Curren status
Jul 28, 2005
14,951
11,403
113
33.8N - 118.4W

Sharky

Rabbitt Bartholomew status
Feb 25, 2006
7,814
11,191
113
Yes, licensed physicians should be able to prescribe any drug they want, meth, cocaine or horse dewormer.

Who is FDA to tell them what to do.
Your doctor can prescribe meth, (the military uses a lot of it) cocaine (as a topical anesthetic) and yes human grade pharmaceutical Ivermectin has been given to literally billions of people world wide.

And "off label" usage of medications is done all the time. It's a thing.

You guys know you can Google this sh!t right?

If someone has a pharmacy tell them they couldn't fill a prescription for Ivermectin, it was probably due to their insurance company refusing to pay. I'm guessing if the patient had offered to pay cash they would have had to fill it. I know other people that did exactly that.

Your medical care is supposed to be between you and your Doctor. In 2024, your medical care is between you, the government, your insurance company and way back in third place... your doctor. It's wrong. It's an example of how your rights are being eroded.
 
Last edited:

$kully

Duke status
Feb 27, 2009
60,776
18,032
113
You're doctor can prescribe meth, (the military uses a lot of it) cocaine (as a topical anesthetic) and yes human grade pharmaceutical Ivermectin has been given to literally billions of people world wide.

And "off label" usage of medications is done all the time. It's a thing.

If someone has a pharmacy tell them they couldn't fill a prescription, it was probably due to their insurance company refusing to pay. I'm guessing if the patient had offered to pay cash they would have had to fill it. I know other people that did exactly that.

Your medical care is supposed to be between you and your Doctor. In 2024, your medical care is between you, the government, your insurance company and way back in third place... your doctor. It's wrong. It's an example of how your rights are being eroded.
I once had a doctor prescribe me a prescription strength lidocaine patch for back pain. The pharmacist wouldn’t fill it because my insurance said I could buy an over the counter one that was 5% weaker. It’s a conspiracy!
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
50,066
23,816
113
My point on ivermectin is this. It was immediately demonized as “horse paste” and lied about as being “dangerous” to the point of ERs being overwhelmed with overdoses (an out and lie) even though the ivermectin used to treat covid was a pill made for humans and had been taken (for other reasons) safely for decades. Some doctors used it to treat covid and some of them said it showed promise. The immediate and vicious attacks on them were troublesome.
moves the goal posts and gets hysterical with the hyperbole and emotional language

it was profit protection...actually it wasn't...it was "vicious attacks" for some unstated reason

lolololol

ineffective and a snipe hunt for antivaxtards FOR antivaxtards

the institutional push back was because it didn't fkn work and people were doing stupid things with it


looking forward to your next shift in the goal posts, DUFFMAN!

Did this decision happen or not?

If it happened (it happened), and your vaunted leftist outlets refused to report it, then what does that say about you and your opinion of what constitutes valid sources?
.
as has been pointed out by someone far smarter than your retarded ass, your article lies by omission. it's not the win you think it is. it's a bunch of 5th circuit loons trying to litigate never forgetter idiocy after the fact when it is totally.fkn.irrelevant....
 

Sharky

Rabbitt Bartholomew status
Feb 25, 2006
7,814
11,191
113
I once had a doctor prescribe me a prescription strength lidocaine patch for back pain. The pharmacist wouldn’t fill it because my insurance said I could buy an over the counter one that was 5% weaker. It’s a conspiracy!
Maybe your doctor knew something the insurance company didn't? Which one of them has a medical degree? :poke:
 

StuAzole

Duke status
Jan 22, 2016
30,371
11,247
113
Did this decision happen or not?

If it happened (it happened), and your vaunted leftist outlets refused to report it, then what does that say about you and your opinion of what constitutes valid sources?
.

Here is the story reported accurately By the evil leftists media. You must not have looked very hard.

The case was settled, not adjudicated, and the end result is the FDA agreed to remove social media posts from 2021.

That’s it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: afoaf