Fauci Deposition Transcript Released: ‘I Don’t Recall’ 174 Times

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,528
2,335
113
.
Fauci Deposition Transcript Released: ‘I Don’t Recall’ 174 Times

------------------------------------------------------------------------



Louisiana and Missouri on Monday released the entirety of the November 23, 2022, deposition of Dr. Anthony Fauci as part of the lawsuit against the Biden administration and federal government, which Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry (R) said confirms that “federal bureaucrats in collusion with social media companies want to control not only what you think, but especially what you say.”

The lawsuit focused on allegations of federal officials colluding with social media companies to censor speech, and Fauci’s deposition, Landry explained, shows that “social engineering tactics were used against the American public, not to limit your exposure to a virus, but to limit your exposure to information that did not fit within a government sanctioned narrative.”

The deposition shows Fauci, again, attempting to sidestep the reality of gain of function research being conducted at the Wuhan lab, deeming gain of function a “misleading terminology” and pointing to “outside groups” — but not the National Institutes of Health (NIH)— that decided to “strictly define the guardrails of experiments that would require additional oversight and did away with the terminology ‘gain of function’ because it can often be very confusing and misleading.”

However, throughout the deposition, Fauci feigned ignorance, stating, “I don’t recall” 174 times when facing questions about various emails, interviews, or “other important documents,” as described by Landry’s press release.

At one point, for instance, Fauci claimed he was not aware of an EcoHealth Alliance grant, awarded by the NIH which was then sub-awarded to the Wuhan lab.

“Did you, at any time later, become aware that NIAID was funding this project understanding the risk of bat Coronavirus emergence?” he was asked.

“I became aware of this after all of the attention was put on it, following the early part of January, February, mid-March of 2020, but I certainly was not aware — well, I wouldn’t say certainly because who knows what came across my desk,” Fauci said, asserting that “thousands of pieces of paper come across my desk.”

“But I do not recall at all being aware of the existence of this grant at the time that it was initially funded of the dates shown on page 2,” he added.

Further, when asked overtly if he held concerns about “what people might be saying on social media about the virus’s origin,” the public figure brazenly claimed that he is “so disassociated from social media.”

“You know, I’m so dissociated from social media. I don’t have a Twitter account. I don’t do Facebook. I don’t do any of that, so I’m not familiar with that. I’ve never gotten involved in any of that,” Fauci claimed before admitting that he personally spoke with Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg.....
------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
 

StuAzole

Duke status
Jan 22, 2016
28,536
9,763
113
I'm not involved with Republican politics but yes, I have personally spoken with Justice Thomas. True story. What does it prove?

It's funny, but didn't you suggest that Trump couldn't be tied to Kanye and Fuentes because how could he possibly know what everyone he meets with is doing?
 
Last edited:

kidfury

Duke status
Oct 14, 2017
24,998
10,749
113
I read your linked story. There's quite a bit of speaking by Fauci. They never state a question asked of Fauci that led to a "I don't recall" response. That would have been useful
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,528
2,335
113
didn't you suggest that Trump couldn't be tied to Kanye and Fuentes because how could he possibly know what everyone he meets with is doing?

Trump did not ever invite Fuentes to his house, and would not have spoken to him if Fuentes had not crashed into Trump's house. It was a setup. And no, liar, I did not use your "meets with is doing" defense. Add that Trump did not deny talking with Fuentes. Fauci lied when he said that he had never spoken with Zuckerburg. Read the article. Wait, you did. You just lied about it.
.
.
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,610
23,218
113
Trump did not ever invite Fuentes to his house, and would not have spoken to him if Fuentes had not crashed into Trump's house. It was a setup. And no, liar, I did not use your "meets with is doing" defense. Add that Trump did not deny talking with Fuentes. Fauci lied when he said that he had never spoken with Zuckerburg. Read the article. Wait, you did. You just lied about it.
.
.
in this post, squidspiracy ignores the fact that all of his previous prognostication has been proven false in multiple courts of law, but also defends the incompetence of the former president's staff who, apparently, didn't even bother to look up who was sitting at the table with the former head of the free world

the mental gymnastics go on and on and on....
 

kidfury

Duke status
Oct 14, 2017
24,998
10,749
113
Trump did not ever invite Fuentes to his house, and would not have spoken to him if Fuentes had not crashed into Trump's house. It was a setup. And no, liar, I did not use your "meets with is doing" defense. Add that Trump did not deny talking with Fuentes. Fauci lied when he said that he had never spoken with Zuckerburg. Read the article. Wait, you did. You just lied about it.
.
.
But he did invite Kanye West, right? If not... can anyone roll up to maralardo and chill with trump?
 

kidfury

Duke status
Oct 14, 2017
24,998
10,749
113
"Fauci was asked during the deposition if he knows anyone who works for a social media platform. He answered that he had been in communication with Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg.
Fauci when asked if he knew anyone else who works for a social media platform other than Zuckerberg, said, “Well, a person who used to work as a software engineer for Twitter was my daughter.”"
 
  • Like
Reactions: afoaf

Woke AF

Tom Curren status
Jul 29, 2009
11,515
7,877
113
Southern Tip, Norcal
How about the part where he was asked if he knew anyone who worked for social media companies and first he obfuscated and then when confronted ultimately admitted that his daughter worked for Twitter. Quite a swamp.
Yeah, just like when your daughter and son-in-law are working for you in gubmit jobs. Swamp forever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: afoaf

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,610
23,218
113
How about the part where he was asked if he knew anyone who worked for social media companies and first he obfuscated and then when confronted ultimately admitted that his daughter worked for Twitter. Quite a swamp.
if you watch the video you can see that the above characterization is total horseshit

how.....unusual
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,528
2,335
113
Bigger question - how many times did he plead the 5th?

As a public servant, pleading the 5th in a court-sanctioned deposition protects the servant from criminal prosecution, but it does not protect the servant from firing or impeachment.

Fauci would have known this going in.
.
 

afoaf

Duke status
Jun 25, 2008
49,610
23,218
113
answers the question that was not asked

squidliar will do such amazing gymnastics to avoid facing his cognitive dissonance
 

StuAzole

Duke status
Jan 22, 2016
28,536
9,763
113
As a public servant, pleading the 5th in a court-sanctioned deposition protects the servant from criminal prosecution, but it does not protect the servant from firing or impeachment.

Fauci would have known this going in.
.
He’s already retiring lol. He’s also not getting fired no matter what he says lol.

Trump plead the fifth hundreds of times. Fauci zero times. Tells you all you need to know.
 

Mike_Jones

Tom Curren status
Mar 5, 2009
11,528
2,335
113
He’s already retiring lol. He’s also not getting fired no matter what he says lol.

Trump plead the fifth hundreds of times. Fauci zero times. Tells you all you need to know.

Hundreds of times? Bullshit.

1. Trump has never been deposed on any actions related to his actions as a public servant, and that's the issue before us here. But you ignored that in order to lie about it.

2. Fauci is the highest paid bureaucrat in government. Period. Fauci WILL retire. If Fauci gets impeached he stands to lose his entire retirement pension. You are saying that would be of little consequence to Fauci, that Fauci could have pled the 5th without consequence.

Bullshit. Ask Tom DeLay and Scooter Libby.
.
 
Last edited: