Who did he shoot that didn't pose a direct threat to himHe went there with a gun to shoot people.
Actually, no. He was forced to shoot 2 of them because they attacked him after threatening to kill him, trying to steal his rifle and hitting him with a blunt object. Which is ample reason for someone to be in fear of their life.Nobody forced him to.
There are some parallels but overall they are too different to make comparisons. Both GZ and the Arbery murderers did far more to force the interactions that led to those incidents.Just like nobody forced Zimmerman to pursue Martin.
And just like nobody forced these three gunturds to pursue Arbery.
More so for the idiots that KR killed.Trouble didn’t come to them, they were looking for trouble.
I do.You should apply your own standard to yourself ya fukking liar.
You've been quoted countless times in this thread by myself and others as you've stood by the criminal dirtbags who were justly shot.I do.
I always quote you when you say something outrageously stupid, which is every day, and then explain to you why are you stupid.
Quote me where did I ever disparage law enforcement or glorified criminals.
Go ahead, fucking liar.
Holy fook. Something I can agree with.Anyone who goes to a protest or riot at night.....with a gun no less......goes there looking for trouble.
Except the KR prosecutor did use that argument, idiotOr could it be that the prosecution used the argument that should have been used in both Zimmerman and Rittenhouse trial?
"You can't create the situation and then go 'I was defending myself'," Ms Dunikoski said, adding that all three defendants had made their decisions because Mr Arbery "was a black man running down the street".
You can't prove that he had the motive to kill anyone. Being armed is also a deterrent.I’m talking about intent.
So did the people he shot, who initiated the confrontation. He never would've singled them out had they not approached him. Facts!Rittenhouse went into battle all on his own accord.
Actually no.Actually, Pico was. Go reread his post and get back to me
.You can't prove that he had the motive to kill anyone. Being armed is also a deterrent.
So did the people he shot, who initiated the confrontation. He never would've singled them out had they not approached him. Facts!
I didn't backpedal on anything. I don't think you even know what that means..
FBI searched his phone and found no proof that he frequented anything related to white nationalism. Facts!You don't open carry and brandish in the middle of the volatile event if you are not prepared to shoot. It's not like it's a secret that he hated BLM and threatened to shoot protestors before.