GromsMom said:
Surfdog said:
Was a bit dubious of the EC at times, but now that I've looked at both sides of the argument, I wouldn't want a handful of highly populated large states to have full say in how the country as a whole is run.
And many may not remember, but states like California were Republican strongholds up to and including 1988. The period between Truman (1948) and Clinton (1992) voted Repub for POTUS every election except JFK. Those were the golden glory days of the California Republic. Since then, illegal immigration (mostly poor) and a large influx of rich/wealthy elitist east coast and Chicago/midwest transplants changed the face of both SF and metro/coastal LA dramatically. All wanting to buy a piece of the California dream at any cost (driving up crazy home prices). We're stuck with what we got now. We'll soon become a west coast version of the I-95 corridor before too long I fear. Even the R hold-outs like the OC and SD are becoming D controlled with urbanized suburbs soaking it up.
Can it happen again? Probably not for decades, if ever, I'm afraid. But if the Dems run California into the ground, succeeding in driving most middle class employing businesses out, leaving only the rich and those that "service" them, it might turn around if your kids get fed up and wise to it.
But, those in power will probably want to keep it that way. I hope you're children can afford to live here and not work 3 jobs at McD's, Starbucks and Walmart to squeak out a living? The few good paying jobs to afford the ever increasing rents and home prices will only be put up with for so long.
Of course you were dubious "before" but now that your boy Donnie has won you love it!!
You keep whining on and on about how awful progressive/democratically controlled California is. Please move then. Kansas is doing quite well I hear with there Republican experiment
(CA has problems for sure, but to solely attribute them to democrats is dumb. Just you politicizing things.)
If this election was other way around, Trump with a slight popular vote edge and Hillary with the Electoral vote edge, this argument would be basically non-existent to the snowflakes out there.
All states have importance to the USA economy. Some by farming, some by tech, some by cleaning and/or fixing toilets for the wealthy.
The elitists here that constantly berate "fly over" country are showing their true bigotry time and again.
All parts of the USA matter. Just because we're fortunate enough to live near the coasts, surf and enjoy all the hedonistic frivolities with it, doesn't mean others who live in BF Egypt or those glorious wilderness areas we all love to visit but don't or CAN'T live at (being stuck in the city rat race), have any less value to the electorate.
Many of you are showing your urban elitism to a fault. Many people live out in the boony's on ranches that have much greater value than your little boxed in studio valued at a $1,000,000. They have many acres of land that are either farmed, ranched or support the local or global community.
Much of the red counties in California are such, and proud small business owners constantly derived as hick rednecks. Sure there's a few tweakers, just like there's 1000's of dependent welfare kings and queens in the very blue inner cities urban/suburban wastelands. I know of many successful ranchers in California, Arizona, Texas, Oregon, Oklahoma, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, and out to Penn, and other midwest and EC states. But because of California's anti-small business policies, more are moving out to other states to keep in business.
All states matter, and most contribute to much of our everyday livelyhoods in some fashion.