A conviction date is public record.
Is there a conviction date for this guy?
This isn’t a leading question. I’m curious
Is there a conviction date for this guy?
This isn’t a leading question. I’m curious
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Durham gets the first Russiagate conviction – Ex-Justice Department lawyer Kevin Clinesmith
- Thread starter Old_Salt
- Start date
I bet that there would not be a conviction
he bet that there would be a conviction
but I'm the one that has to prove there was a conviction?!
surfdog is so far off the deep end on this it's fkn comical
the burden is clearly on him to prove he achieved his outcome
instead of doing that, he keeps posting non sequiturs
....."And Judge James Boasberg did accept the plea after eliciting it in accordance with settled criminal-law rules. Sentencing is scheduled for December 10. So it’s official."....
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/08/clinesmiths-guilty-plea-the-perfect-snapshot-of-crossfire-hurricane-duplicity/
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/08/clinesmiths-guilty-plea-the-perfect-snapshot-of-crossfire-hurricane-duplicity/
Clinesmith is already convicted. That was one Aug. 19
You might be confusing the term with sentencing. Which was a date assigned (Dec 10) when he was convicted Aug. 19.
For your clarification and definition between the two terms, that many think are interchangeable.....
https://thetrcompany.com/en/difference-between-conviction-and-sentence/
The link above also defines "conviction" in a bit more detail.
"The key to distinguishing the terms is to think of Conviction as something that precedes a Sentence."
SEE, GUYS, THE NATIONAL REVIEW SAYS "IT'S OFFICIAL"
I still don't see a judgement of convictiion
keep posting cool articles, I guess
HOLY sh!t this is sad....
You STILL are avoiding my simple question.
How is a sentencing date assigned, if he's not already convicted?
How does one get a sentencing hearing, if not convicted?
What's sad is that you're afraid to answer that simple question honestly.
Answer that, and you will see who's right.
Because he pleaded guilty?
You plead guilty so you don't go to trial and get convicted.
Maybe get a note from your wife?
You plead guilty so you don't go to trial and get convicted.
Maybe get a note from your wife?
Doesn't matter if he plead guilty or judged guilty.
Judge officially accepted his guilty plea, and that is considered his conviction.
Try again, and answer the sentencing question.
Surely this is written down somewhere?
Why won't you provide this documentation to prove your case?
Are you Bohter now?
Once the judge officially accepts it, yes.
And that was done Aug. 19.
Conviction
A guilty plea results in conviction. By pleading guilty, the defendant admits to all elements of the crimes to which he is pleading. Likewise, the defendant admits that all material facts alleged in the charges are true. Therefore, a guilty plea serves as an adjudication on the merits of a case.
https://federal-lawyer.com/consequence-guilty-plea/#:~:text=A guilty plea results in,the merits of a case.
This is very clear cut, and not subject to interpretation.
a conviction requires that a judgement of conviction be entered by the judge
it's procedural
"a conviction" is a well-defined case disposition which is why I used this very
clear and commonly-understood term
once again, if you didn't know what a conviction entailed and instead want to
use the entry of a plea as the basis of the bet why didn't you state that to begin
with? you agreed to a bet with very simple terms, but you don't seem to have a
functional grasp of what they mean.
did you attempt to corroborate anything I've stated with actual.fkn.attorneys yet?!