It represents the segment of the market that cries the loudest, not the market as a whole.Cancel culture is the free market at work.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
It represents the segment of the market that cries the loudest, not the market as a whole.Cancel culture is the free market at work.
No, it represents the free market responding to those that cry the loudest in what they determine to be in the best interest of their business(es). Why do you hate capitalism so much? What you guys call cancel culture and falsely attribute to the Democratic Party is nothing but people protesting with their wallets and businesses responding.It represents the segment of the market that cries the loudest, not the market as a whole.
This does not count!!!!!!!No, it represents the free market responding to those that cry the loudest in what they determine to be in the best interest of their business(es). Why do you hate capitalism so much? What you guys call cancel culture and falsely attribute to the Democratic Party is nothing but people protesting with their wallets and businesses responding.
This is what cancel culture from the government looks like...
The Trump administration scrubs climate change info from websites. These two have survived.
Climate change science is disappearing from U.S. government websites under Trump. But these two sites are thriving.www.nbcnews.com
The EPA's Website After a Year of Climate Change Censorship
What it used to look like, and how it looks now.time.com
yeah, and woke = broke. never cater to a micro market of crybabies at the expense of the majority. good way to go bankrupt as a company unless socialism artificially saves uIt represents the segment of the market that cries the loudest, not the market as a whole.
How's the Wavestorm count at your usual break?yeah, and woke = broke. never cater to a micro market of crybabies at the expense of the majority. good way to go bankrupt as a company unless socialism artificially saves u
I'm sorry this is happening to you, Havocyeah, and woke = broke. never cater to a micro market of crybabies at the expense of the majority. good way to go bankrupt as a company unless socialism artificially saves u
Yeah that's why Twitter folded and Gab/Parler are the go-to for vapid musings.yeah, and woke = broke. never cater to a micro market of crybabies at the expense of the majority. good way to go bankrupt as a company unless socialism artificially saves u
So you are admitting that they are crybabies. That's a start. However I question whether those decisions are always beneficial, as I'm sure there are some situations where that backfires.No, it represents the free market responding to those that cry the loudest in what they determine to be in the best interest of their business(es). Why do you hate capitalism so much?
I've never attributed Cancel Culture to the democratic party.What you guys call cancel culture and falsely attribute to the Democratic Party is nothing but people protesting with their wallets and businesses responding.
So you are admitting that they are crybabies. That's a start. However I question whether those decisions are always beneficial, as I'm sure there are some situations where that backfires.
For example, NBA playoff viewership was way down by more than 50% in 2020 compared to 2019, in a year where people were desperate for stuff to watch. Probably because a lot of people just want to enjoy watching a game without the politics. The knife cuts both ways.
I've never attributed Cancel Culture to the democratic party.
It's often analogous to the restaurant owner who takes an item of the menu that a lot of his customers like because it got slammed in a few yelp reviews. The market isn't deciding in that situation.it doesn't matter if the decisions are beneficial or not, the market is adjusting to what it thinks will be beneficial. Business decisions often blow up in business owners faces. The only point I'm making is that the cancel culture you assclowns are constantly shrieking about is more often than not businesses adjusting to customers and not entirely political. Democrats aren't cancelling things or people like Gina Carano, businesses with bottom lines like Disney are.
The market is absolutely deciding in that situation. It wasn't the government that forced the restaurant owner's hand, it was his reaction to the perception of a menu item in the market.It's often analogous to the restaurant owner who takes an item of the menu that a lot of his customers like because it got slammed in a few yelp reviews. The market isn't deciding in that situation.
Traditionally markets decide by collectively buying or not buying something. If the market is buying something regularly, or not, that's the market deciding.The market is absolutely deciding in that situation. It wasn't the government that forced the restaurant owner's hand, it was his reaction to the perception of a menu item in the market.
If the owner of the entity bringing goods/services to market is deciding, that's still essentially the market deciding. That they chose to get out in front of it instead of having an entire failed cycle seems immaterial.Traditionally markets decide by collectively buying or not buying something. If the market is buying something regularly, or not, that's the market deciding.
The government is irrelevant in my example.
No it's not. Neener neener. I see the market deciding on something as people collectively voting with their wallets.If the owner of the entity bringing goods/services to market is deciding, that's still essentially the market deciding.
Great point. you da man!It's often analogous to the restaurant owner who takes an item of the menu that a lot of his customers like because it got slammed in a few yelp reviews. The market isn't deciding in that situation.
It's often analogous to the restaurant owner who takes an item of the menu that a lot of his customers like because it got slammed in a few yelp reviews. The market isn't deciding in that situation.
Traditionally markets decide by collectively buying or not buying something. If the market is buying something regularly, or not, that's the market deciding.
The government is irrelevant in my example.