REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Can we talk about Marjorie Taylor Green?
- Thread starter hal9000
- Start date
You are delusional, lets talk about all rightwing racist attacks(all lies) from your team.
The point is that when we're talking exclusively about each other what we aren't talking about are the strengths or weaknesses of whatever reasoning someone might be posting in support of their opinions.
Screeching at each other about each other is how we expect the Real Housewives to fight. By which I am not ilking everyone here because not everyone is doing that. But a few posters have been doing that almost exclusively.
Screeching at each other about each other is how we expect the Real Housewives to fight. By which I am not ilking everyone here because not everyone is doing that. But a few posters have been doing that almost exclusively.
Wrong, Trumps band of grifters, criminals and extremists should have never been in public office in the first place.
When my response to a point you're making consists *solely* of calling you an idiot or a cuck or whatnot then you can call my observation above as a hypocrisy. That would be a personal ad hominem. Me expressing different opinions of various topics doesn't amount to a #mundusmanbad response.
Which is not to deny that I have responded to people on the solely personal level, but it's not my default and I seldom initiate those exchanges. Like this exchange with AFOAF, for example. I didn't say one word to him on the personal level before he responded that way to a comment I made.
is the irony lost on you? Your complaints about personal attacks are all personal attacks. You have stated that you support conservative corruption, trump corruption simply because those actors are not liberal. You've reported what amounts to irrational paranoia of "socialism," and a calloused disregard for the rights of many citizens and non-citizens.
I'm certain you could care less, but you're going in the same folder as squidley and gromsdad .
Last edited:
Like I said, it's not my default and I usually don't start or even engage that way in most of these exchanges. I usually just let them slide without responding in kind.
My sole personal crack in this thread was to respond to AFOAF by pointing out he's been operating in chick mode a lot. After he called me an incel (which is pretty ironic when considering I'm still happily married).
My sole personal crack in this thread was to respond to AFOAF by pointing out he's been operating in chick mode a lot. After he called me an incel (which is pretty ironic when considering I'm still happily married).
It’s interesting that the same people who were upset about how the Covington Catholic kids were treated aren’t also condemning MTG for her abusive behavior.
totally
nailed it
just crying all over the place
I should get a tissue
,,,,and then lament the fading whiteness of America
You have stated that you support conservative corruption, trump corruption simply because those actors are not liberal. You've reported what amounts to irrational paranoia of "socialism," and a calloused disregard for the rights of many citizens and non-citizens.
Even if true, none of that amounts to a personal attack on any poster. It's not screeching at you or anyone else here and telling you that you're a (fill in the blank) because you disagree with me.The people who are doing this (left and right alike) will continue on, of that I have no doubt. I made my point and that's enough.
ohhh, the purge! UnAMerICaN!
also, "attempted coup at DOJ? Pfft, it didn't even work, so what's the problem?"
I hate to say it, but this is the sort of stuff that should have come out before the election, not after.
I don't know what the process is to expel a member of the house, but her constituents elected her and it seems wrong to try to remove her just because she's batshit crazy.
From a quick look, only 5 house members have ever been removed. 3 for supporting the confederacy and 2 after being convicted of crimes. Maybe she'll get there, but she's not there right now.