I was on the road most of the day yesterday. In my first post on this thread, I simply commented on Duffys comment while I stopped for lunch, that is very similar to the one that you last quoted of me. So no, I did not have time to read the articles posted. You posted that laundry list of links after I made that comment.
The article from “the Hill” linked in the Twitter post is poorly written and does not make a strong case if taken in isolation. It only alludes to emails with no real substance about the emails themselves. The NPR article is at least more thorough, and yes, it does indicate that has probably spent a fair amount of time reading and lots distributing racist material.
With that, yes, there is enough proof to suggest that he is a probably a racist, but I’d at least like to see an example of exactly what he wrote and/or distributed before I call someone a racist.
Which was exactly my point from the start. I don’t believe in this “guilty until proven innocent” nonsense when it comes to racism.