REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
I'm not disagreeing with that part of it. I'm questioning whether JP actually said that, especially given the controversy over pronouns. Therefore I'd be surprised if he did. From what I understand, gender is how you identify and biological sex is your plumbing. Sometimes people use the terms interchangeably. Even if they shouldn't, it happens.
How convenient
So now I can just say "heard it on Rogan!" and not post a direct quote or even an episode, and it's your responsibility to listen to (tens of) thousands of hours to prove me wrong 
Just want to be clear on the ground rules 
So gender is a social construct and not a scientific term. So much for your "anti-science" claim.I'm not disagreeing with that part of it. I'm questioning whether JP actually said that, especially given the controversy over pronouns. Therefore I'd be surprised if he did. From what I understand, gender is how you identify and biological sex is your plumbing. Sometimes people use the terms interchangeably- it happens.
How convenient
BTW I have no desire to listen to his podcast, he's a loon and a chore to listen to.
I guess the question then is how much it has anything to do with biological sex.So gender is a social construct and not a scientific term. So much for your "anti-science" claim.
If you think Im going to sit through hours of Jordan Peterson' s podcasts to prove you wrong, you're fucking insane.
It's a widely accepted definition, even the loons like Peterson are not disputing it. He's disputing transgender rights and laws that protect them.View attachment 139827
Well, not much apparently.
Not really. I even admitted that the terms are used interchangeably more often than they should, and that I am sometimes guilty of this. To be exact and dictionary compliant, the effects of "biological sex" on sports, athleticism and physicality are indisputable. Democrats making legislation that undermines this is either ignoring the scientific facts or telling women to eat sh!t and deal with it.
I'm not asking you to, but it's not my responsibility to take your word for it either if you don't have proof. That's how that works. Especially because we've all seen how badly you butcher the statements of other people, whether that's intentional and/or your own difficulty with understanding what people say.If you think Im going to sit through hours of Jordan Peterson' s podcasts to prove you wrong, you're fucking insane.
Again, not disagreeing with that. What I questioned is whether JP said that.
Which laws exactly?
Even democrats are divided +/- right down the middle over whether transpeople should compete in sports. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/29/1107484965/transgender-athletes-trans-rights-gender-transition-poll
I doubt many people disagree with this.
Okay good, we agree on something.Not really. I even admitted that the terms are used interchangeably more often than they should, and that I am sometimes guilty of this. To be exact and dictionary compliant, the effects of "biological sex" on sports, athleticism and physicality are indisputable. Democrats making legislation that undermines this is either ignoring the scientific facts or telling women to eat sh!t and deal with it.
I'm not asking you to, but it's not my responsibility to take your word for it either if you don't have proof. That's how that works. Especially because we've all seen how badly you butcher the statements of other people, whether that's intentional and/or your own difficulty with understanding what people say.
Again, not disagreeing with that. What I questioned is whether JP said that.
Which laws exactly?
www.theguardian.com
Fringes like President Biden? Fringes like the International Olympic Committee?
Italians are the original Latin Americans.
No actual response to my other post?Fringes like President Biden? Fringes like the International Olympic Committee?
Do you know what “fringe” actuallly means
It's obviously a big enough issue for the Biden administration to get involved. It's either a fringe issue that nobody should worry about, in which case why is the administration bothering with it because we have far bigger problems, or it's enough of an issue that it needs to be addressed one way or another. Can't be both.
Yes, going back for 2 decades, during times when it was not socially acceptable to be trans. However if you look at high school sports there are far more trans athletes and many are dominating and breaking records. This is where it pisses regular people off because it threatens scholarship opportunities for young women.
no, that would be the spaniards, the Italians ceded their chance when they told Columbus to fk off
LOL
The forum resident racist has chimed in.
There doesn't seem to be a centralized database for this sort of thing but here's some examples:
www.outsports.com
everyone agrees. why are people arguing?
