I think you forgot the study on feminist glaciology, where the field of glaciology is inherently sexist. Only by embracing indigenous ideas on the formation of glaciers can we separate the patriarchy from this field.Lefty pseudoscience. There's not many major (ridiculous) left public intellectual figures any more on the magnitude of Jordan Peterson but there are thousands of useless professors, pumping out unreadable grievance dreck on the taxpayer dime. These sorts of papers generally go uncited. They're training the trainers. It's the stuff that you're supporting.
That woman is probably frigid.I think you forgot the study on feminist glaciology, where the field of glaciology is inherently sexist. Only by embracing indigenous ideas on the formation of glaciers can we separate the patriarchy from this field.
You can’t make this stuff up
Why an article about ‘feminist glaciology’ in a major geography journal has been its top-read story for monthsThe article, which was intended to start a conversation about the role of women in science, caused intense backlash from bloggers and columnists who call the article ‘gibberish’nationalpost.com
Also, this study was tax payer funded via the NSF, with the author getting $459k for this “research”
Apparently white privilege is embedded in pumpkins:
Their thesis is that white privilege is now heavily “encoded” in pumpkins, and that this symbolic link between the two has become “perilous” in contemporary American culture.”
From the published and peer-reviewed article “The Perilous Whiteness of Pumpkins”
But yeah, JP is the real pseudoscientist!
You are correct that there are not wackjob lefty JP or Shapiro equivalents in regards to the size of their social media followings.?
I literally asked if there's a lefty equivalent to what the far right is doing and you came up with a bunch of obscure papers nobody has ever heard of.
And you say it's not comparable?
So the entire alt-right movement does not have a left equivalent and the SJW threat is grossly exhaggarated and disproportional to the scale of the war the far right is waging.
That's what I thought.
Lots of good work going on at the university.You and your ilk just don’t understand the value of academia in modern society.
Tell that to the guy who's pretending to be you and renting your oondo.
Yes, but the authors like this are legion & they're pushing this nonsense on kids. So it's the difference between a couple of YouTube stars and a mass movement."These sorts of papers generally go uncited"
so we're equating right-wing hacks with very large platforms to obscure academic
papers that have admittedly low/no audience whatsoever.
The “whiteness in pumpkins” author is a tenured professor at UNC Chapel Hill. Hardly weird or obscure. Many of these academics have huge audiences.I respectfully disagree with your statement that they are "pushing this nonsense on kids"
maybe if you get in to some weird womens/gender studies coursework in college, but by
then you're already a lost cause.