Does this mean you are not going to engage him about WhatsApp?Omfg
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Does this mean you are not going to engage him about WhatsApp?Omfg
He’s right about WhatsApp internationally but it’s got nothing to do with regulation of social media in America.Does this mean you are not going to engage him about WhatsApp?
Thanks, that makes 4He’s right about WhatsApp internationally but it’s got nothing to do with regulation of social media in America.
Being wrong doesn’t make him a liar.Thanks, that makes 4
Anything that proves PB to be the pathological liar that he is will always be a win, regardless of relevance
If he's not a liar then he's just plain stupid. Both are winsBeing wrong doesn’t make him a liar.
Imagine bringing an unrelated topic into a discussion to try to distract from your own stupidity and then strut around and claim a "win".If he's not a liar then he's just plain stupid. Both are wins
I explained the distinction literally a dozen times, and he just kept stonewalling and repeating himself.
Had you bowed out gracefully upon being proven wrong the first time, aka ghosting like you've done before, then we could've moved on . . . .Except you didn'tImagine bringing an unrelated topic into a discussion to try to distract from your own stupidity and then strut around and claim a "win".
Further proof that your "backpedal" schtick is exactly that . .. A bullshit deflectionary schtick. I have not diverted from my very first post in this thread that you took issue with, and all I've done is stick to the exact same message that you kept struggling to understand. Me having to clarify my position because you are too dumb and dishonest to understand what I am saying is not backpedaling. Learn the difference alreadyYou will deflect, backpedal and change topics to avoid admitting your own stupidity, literally forever.
Says the guy still replying after being proven wrong over and over
Bowed out of what?Had you bowed out gracefully upon being proven wrong the first time, aka ghosting like you've done before, then we could've moved on . . . .Except you didn't
Further proof that your "backpedal" schtick is exactly that . .. A bullshit deflectionary schtick. I have not diverted from my very first post in this thread that you took issue with, and all I've done is stick to the exact same message that you kept struggling to understand. Me having to clarify my position because you are too dumb and dishonest to understand what I am saying is not backpedaling. Learn the difference already
Says the guy still replying after being proven wrong over and over
Yep. And I would have to pay for music and screw that nonsense.Youtube has to stick around. I wouldn't know how to fix anything if it wasn't for YT.