You have experts both in economics and health advising for whatever is being done.
There is also a guy on instagram claiming he knows what's up.
There is also a guy on instagram claiming he knows what's up.
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Covid Skepticism
- Thread starter Ranga
- Start date
Gromsdad is also a lagging indicator, on pretty much everything.
Care to discuss this article?
I'd love to hear your rebuttal in detail with well reasoned clearly stated logical statements.....
Step up to the plate and give it a swing.....
As long as you're posting a (questionable) graph regarding Ontario, here's what they're saying about masks. Read it, unless you're allergic to science.
" As a way to actually refine the position you agree with by intentionally poking holes in it. As rational beings, I feel it's our moral duty to arrive at the strongest arguments toward truth (whatever that means). So the purpose isn't just to argue, or to get the other sides views more representation. It's a refinement process. We should have good reasons for believing what we do, not shitty reasons. Sometimes, even the commonly held bastions of "common sense" are founded on the bedrock of nonsense, which deserves to be questioned.
I view devils advocates as consistency scanners. Even if I agree with your conclusion, I disagree with your process, and so I'll argue the opposite view using your process, to hopefully highlight any weak links in the argument.
Playing the devil's advocate isn't about advocating a view you disagree with, it's about being mischievous by arguing against something you somewhat support.
How is any of this wrong? Why do I have to explain that I agree with your conclusion to point out that your reasoning is flawed? I'd almost argue the opposite here: it's worse to reveal you agree with the conclusion, because you're telling the person they should only believe what you believe in the way that you see it. It's presumptuous.
A better approach is to simply point out the flaws, regardless of your view. The difference between the devil's advocate and an opposing view point is the devil's advocate wants you to maintain your conclusion, whereas the opposing side wants you to change your conclusion.
People often misinterpret wanting to change your reasoning as also changing your conclusion, and I think this is mostly due to a necessary link between reasoning →conclusion. If you break their reasoning, then they may fear their conclusion can change. And maybe it will! That's what having an open mind is about.
I think this is where your misunderstanding is coming from. You're confusing the people who argue for you to change your conclusions (not devil's advocates) with those who want to change your reasoning (devil's advocates)." - some woman on the internet
I view devils advocates as consistency scanners. Even if I agree with your conclusion, I disagree with your process, and so I'll argue the opposite view using your process, to hopefully highlight any weak links in the argument.
Playing the devil's advocate isn't about advocating a view you disagree with, it's about being mischievous by arguing against something you somewhat support.
How is any of this wrong? Why do I have to explain that I agree with your conclusion to point out that your reasoning is flawed? I'd almost argue the opposite here: it's worse to reveal you agree with the conclusion, because you're telling the person they should only believe what you believe in the way that you see it. It's presumptuous.
A better approach is to simply point out the flaws, regardless of your view. The difference between the devil's advocate and an opposing view point is the devil's advocate wants you to maintain your conclusion, whereas the opposing side wants you to change your conclusion.
People often misinterpret wanting to change your reasoning as also changing your conclusion, and I think this is mostly due to a necessary link between reasoning →conclusion. If you break their reasoning, then they may fear their conclusion can change. And maybe it will! That's what having an open mind is about.
I think this is where your misunderstanding is coming from. You're confusing the people who argue for you to change your conclusions (not devil's advocates) with those who want to change your reasoning (devil's advocates)." - some woman on the internet
You forgot to include the margin of error, which is somewhere between 6% and 97%, depending on where you run the numbers, making extrapolating pointless exercise.
Opinion | The Ideological Corruption of Science
In American laboratories and universities, the spirit of Trofim Lysenko has suddenly been woke.
www.wsj.com
Lawrence Krauss shares some of my concerns about process.
Are you referring to your previous scientific analysis where you admitted that you just made sh*t up? You're still doing it.
I think too many stupid people want to be right about something and now we are all fucked.
Not just about covid but in general.
youtube is the new oracle, if do not agree with something its fake news, science is now disputed by morons who couldn't pass high school biology...we are so unbelievably doomed
Not just about covid but in general.
youtube is the new oracle, if do not agree with something its fake news, science is now disputed by morons who couldn't pass high school biology...we are so unbelievably doomed
The "off" Guardian?
Please enroll in an information literacy course at your nearest community college. You may have to take the course online, there's something nasty going around.
Last edited:
Another Voice (Rev. 18:4): Minion World Order: "You're A Minion" Says ZWO - No Male, Female, Race...Only 'Minions' To Be Enslaved 2015 Promo
....I am goingoutside now....be not a "minion"....do not go along with them, ....and do not be enslaved by them...
....I am goingoutside now....be not a "minion"....do not go along with them, ....and do not be enslaved by them...
Espn has its reporters wearing gloves. Showing footage of a man who passed multiple covid tests in two countries, wearing his mask as he exits quarantine.
Because it's about compliance, not logic.
Because it's about compliance, not logic.
