REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Living in your own little fantasy world I seeGlad to see the Trumtards proving they have zero integrity once again.
LOL, Trump directly attacks the 1st amendment and using govt to interfere with a private business, we get "no big deal' from the same person who incessantly screeches on culture war issues, like I said zero integrity.Living in your own little fantasy world I see
I think it’s well within the 1ALOL, Trump directly attacks the 1st amendment and using govt to interfere with a private business, we get "no big deal' from the same person who incessantly screeches on culture war issues, like I said zero integrity.
That has nothing to do with what Trump is doing, and you know it. He is just lashing out like a spoiled child because someone had the gall to call him out on his lies, and his mentally ill cultists applaud,I think it’s well within the 1A
he’s just saying if you’re regulating content on your sites, then you’re going to be treated as responsible for content on your sites, just like a newspaper
not seeing how there is any constitutional problem here
if they don’t want this treatment, then they should stop curating content
This is what we call Fecalization.LOL, Trump directly attacks the 1st amendment and using govt to interfere with a private business, we get "no big deal' from the same person who incessantly screeches on culture war issues, like I said zero integrity.
it’s weird how you don’t respond to the actual words I use and just reply to your imaginary boogeymenThat has nothing to do with what Trump is doing, and you know it. He is just lashing out like a spoiled child because someone had the gall to call him out on his lies, and his mentally ill cultists applaud,
He’s looking for love in all the wrong places.This is what we call Fecalization.
I have agreed with you from the beginning that Trump is 100% in the wrong here yet you're still arguing
Are you a woman?
And you have a problem with the government interfering with private business now? You were all about intervention when it was stayhooming
Trump does something that his cultist have been screeching against yet they still support him, LOL!
Trumby screeches on twitter that twitter should be shut down.....they cheer him on.
This country has become a Vonnegut novel.
Because for at least a little while longer despite Trumps best efforts we are still a nation of laws.Trump is leader of the United States government. If Trump actually thought the government should shut down Twitter then why didn't he shut Twitter down?
.
Firing inspector generals when they investigate his administration for one. Not divesting from his businesses, installing unelected unqualified family member in positions of power without security checks, encouraging police brutality and many other things.Which efforts are those?
it's a lieBullshit. Twitter did not merely "flag" Trump's post. Twitter made an argument opposing Trump's viewpoint. That totally removes Twitter's status as a platform, and places them under FEC regulatory laws.
Is it okay to oppose Trump's viewpoint? Sure, but Twitter can't lie to its participants by claiming to simply be moderating.
.
So you want to bring back the fairness doctrine, which Saint Reagan got rid of?Regardless of what you call it, Twitter has an opinion and is expressing that opinion. What they're not doing is staying out of political discourse.
You like to use the phone company blocking spam, well spam is sent to you on the unsolicited and involuntary basis and you have to opt into call blocking lists. That's not what happens with Twitter followers who choose to follow Trump or choose to read one of his tweets. As well, the phone company doesn't break into your calls to inform you that the person you're speaking with just told you a lie.
So none of that line of reasoning works.