You and your ilkWho's Zimmerman a hero to?
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You and your ilkWho's Zimmerman a hero to?
He had a busted face because he was a Adderall junkie chomo stalking another kid and this one retaliated after being accosted.Then how did GZ end up with a busted up face? Pretty easy to make a self defense claim with that, and it’s more than enough reasonable doubt for an acquittal.
I agree 100%. Although it comes down to is whether he broke the law or not. If Trayvon really did beat his ass, then you can make a self defense claim.He had a busted face because he was a Adderall junkie chomo stalking another kid and this one retaliated after being accosted.
Trayvon Martin wins that fight - he gets a key to the city for taking Zimmerman out of the population.
Guarantee if Zimmerman doesn't have a gun, he wouldn't have acted like a stalking little bitch. But then again, isn't that the reason people like Zimmerman need to be packing heat in the first place: For the sake of security to be a confrontational asshole. Just like the guy who killed Joe McKnight. And like the Handicap Space Avenger who now realizes that he's the n*gger in prison after taking a padlock in a sock to the face. Just that latter news alone made me want to watch that Sean Penn movie Bad Boys again.
We can save the discussion of whether guns make the criminal or the criminal makes the gun for another thread. Serious Venning there though.
Bottom line: Sea level rise isn't happening fast enough for Florida.
Then how did GZ end up with a busted up face? Pretty easy to make a self defense claim with that, and it’s more than enough reasonable doubt for an acquittal.
squidley said:You just strongly implied it.
GDaddy said:Not my intention, actually.
I don't assume that just because you post an article automatically means that you agree with it. I sometimes post articles I don't necessarily agree with. But whether you do or don't agree with the merits of these actions makes no difference WRT my commentary on Zimmerman. He is no model citizen so even if he's 100% justified it's still a case of asshole-on-asshole as far as I'm concerned.
I actively defended the doesn't-appear-guilty-of-murder allegation from the start, based on the facts of which we were aware. Those fact patterns held up through the trial so I wasn't surprised when he was eventually judged not guilty. That doesn't make me an apologist or a supporter of how he lives his life from that point forward.
lolz. So you think you have the right to turn around and start throwing blows on someone for following you? Good luck with that in front of a judge. Probably the dumbest thing you can decide to do, especially with someone who is armed. Better off running if you feel that threatened, unless you are backed into a corner.Why didn't the unarmed kid who wasn't trespassing have a right to defend himself from the fat guy pursuing him with a loaded firearm? Is self-defense the exclusive right of those who are carrying firearms?
Why didn't the unarmed kid who wasn't trespassing have a right to defend himself from the fat guy pursuing him with a loaded firearm? Is self-defense the exclusive right of those who are carrying firearms?
Again, I didn't assume you posting the article amounted to vouching for Zimmerman's character or conduct. But a simple glance at the coverage demonstrates that at least *some* people are letting themselves get too attached to his cause.Your implication that posting the article represented "cheerleading" for Zimmerman, and that I shouldn't because ha's a scumbag. In the issue of these idiots accusing Zimmerman of racial murder Zimmerman is correct. That's what I said.
.
We went over this this a thousand times. "Pursuing" implies trying to catch up with someone. There was no evidence that Zimmerman was trying to catch up with Martin. And there was cell phone evidence that Zimmerman was trying to keep up and follow a running Martin. Conversely, after hiding, Martin "pursued" Zimmerman, and proceeded to try and beat Zimmerman's brains in.
The jury heard all of that evidence. Unanimously they agreed with me, and disagreed with you. How does it feel to be that wrong?
.
Do you understand the concept of “beyond a reasonable doubt”?The jury heard Zimmerman's side of the story. Trayvon Martin never got a day in court.
He'll probably end up settling for 5 bumps and a free round of mini golf.Going back to the original post, It sounds like Zim has a good legal case.
Ifall, like,Chuck Norris, never shows regretWhich he (Avenatti) wasn't when he was making the rounds on TV and publicly mulling his prospects for running for President.
The point I'm making is that anyone who is cheerleading Z-Man because he's inserting himself into the news by trying to sue these politicians will be hating it the next time he gets into another fight or gets arrested for beating his girlfriend. This guy in no hero.
irony, it's what's for breakfast...How does it feel to be that wrong?