official shooting thread 2023 - no point having multiple threads

Duffy LaCoronilla

Duke status
Apr 27, 2016
39,130
28,670
113
who the fk shoots a bear?

you can't even eat them, can you?!
Bear meat can be very good. It depends on some factors, mostly what the bears eat. You get a bear that has been eating nothing but berries and it’s arguably the best meat you ever have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot

hammies

Duke status
Apr 8, 2006
15,594
14,238
113
The idea that America is relatively dangerous is justifiable. IDK how many tourists stay away because of their silly warning, though. Prob about as many as American tourists who stay away from France because socialism might rub off on them?

1684697355785.png
 

Attachments

ElOgro

Duke status
Dec 3, 2010
32,154
12,145
113

I think you can read this in English on a desktop.

Many of us have passed over that very spot.
 

Lance Mannion

Duke status
Mar 7, 2009
26,509
2,400
113
In Gods Country

I think you can read this in English on a desktop.

Many of us have passed over that very spot.
I wonder if the gunmen knew that guns are illegal in Mexico?
 

sirfun

Duke status
Apr 26, 2008
17,787
7,039
113
U.S.A.
Great thread title !! )

Once again and I hate to say it but

GROMSDAD is right !! )

Banana Republic !! )

 

Sharkbiscuit

Duke status
Aug 6, 2003
26,642
19,587
113
Jacksonville Beach

I think you can read this in English on a desktop.

Many of us have passed over that very spot.
It says the sand people shot up Jabba's desert race.



 

Duffy LaCoronilla

Duke status
Apr 27, 2016
39,130
28,670
113
The idea that America is relatively dangerous is justifiable. IDK how many tourists stay away because of their silly warning, though. Prob about as many as American tourists who stay away from France because socialism might rub off on them?

View attachment 154674
Again mixing ”gun deaths” all together when over half of them are suicides, some accidents and most of the rest gang related shootings in very specific neighborhoods.

A comparison of murder rates (regardless of tool used in the murder) would be a useful measure of how dangerous a country is.

This graph is so misleading it’s basically just huge lie in graphic form and is worse than useless.
 

slipped_disc

Billy Hamilton status
Jun 27, 2019
1,616
2,434
113
Again mixing ”gun deaths” all together when over half of them are suicides, some accidents and most of the rest gang related shootings in very specific neighborhoods.

A comparison of murder rates (regardless of tool used in the murder) would be a useful measure of how dangerous a country is.

This graph is so misleading it’s basically just huge lie in graphic form and is worse than useless.
We actually agree. If I remember correctly, about half — little less — of gun deaths in the country are homicide.

Also, I wonder what the comparison would like next to a known violent place.

edit: more detailed info here:

 
Last edited:

Duffy LaCoronilla

Duke status
Apr 27, 2016
39,130
28,670
113
We actually agree. If I remember correctly, about half — little less — of gun deaths in the country are homicide.

Also, I wonder what the comparison would like next to a known violent place.

edit: more detailed info here:

1. Why are we only looking at one specific cause of death?

2. Why are we making the leap from that one specific cause of death to insinuate that the US is more dangerous/violent because of guns when over half of ”gun deaths” are suicides, therefore are not even an act of violence against another person?

Another slightly less half of “gun deaths” are homicides. How many of those homicides are acts of self defense, police shootings, accidents, etc. They don’t say. “Homicide“ is one person causing the death of another person. Why use “homicide“ and not “murder”?


3. Why do we ignore rates of actual violence perpetrated compared to other countries?

4. Why do we ignore the fact that a very tiny segment of the US population in very specific relatively small (neighborhood level) areas account for the majority of violent crimes and imply that everywhere you go in the US you might get killed?

The answer (to me) is obvious. The people who present these stats about “gun deaths” are being misleading, disingenuous and spreading disinformation/propaganda.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot

Duffy LaCoronilla

Duke status
Apr 27, 2016
39,130
28,670
113
Countries with the Highest Rates of Violent Gun Death (Homicides) per 100k residents in 2019
  1. El Salvador — 36.78
  2. Venezuela — 33.27
  3. Guatemala — 29.06
  4. Colombia — 26.36
  5. Brazil — 21.93
  6. Bahamas — 21.52
  7. Honduras — 20.15
  8. U.S. Virgin Islands — 19.40
  9. Puerto Rico — 18.14
  10. Mexico — 16.41
What are the gun laws in these countries?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ifallalot

slipped_disc

Billy Hamilton status
Jun 27, 2019
1,616
2,434
113
I agree that total gun deaths isn’t a good way to evaluate safety of a country.

but the US stats for gun homicide are nothing to brag about or defend either. Yemen and Palestine are doing better than us. And first world countries are generally half of what we are.