The same guy telling us EV's can't work in 2035. Karens gotta Karen.
Last edited:
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The same guy telling us EV's can't work in 2035. Karens gotta Karen.
The hoofs fell off.It's a Chevy. It'll be in the shop before you know it.
probably no foul play involvedthe boss at Lukoil just took a swan dive out of his russian hospital
window....
It takes a huge, prolonged inflation period and resulting recession to cool the overheated spike.Oil flirting with $80. Down almost $45 since the peak.
Way to go, JOE!
JOe's not responsible for oil prices, up or down. That's why I posted it. He never was, and never will be.It takes a huge, prolonged inflation period and resulting recession to cool the overheated spike.
Economy flailing is now the result.
I thought Joe wasn't responsible for global oil price movements?
Now he is. We'll remember that.
Gas prices down all the way back to......
March (6 months ago), when Putin invaded and added the 2nd big surge in gas prices.
We already doubled gas price by then (March, 2022) from the prior year, and what got inflation off the 40 year highs to begin with.
We need oil well below $70 a barrel (at a sustained price) to have any chance of slowing inflation and prolonging this recession.
This winter is going to hurt a lot of people in the Western modern 1st world. Europe is stressing it, for one.
But Trump was responsible for oil prices?JOe's not responsible for oil prices, up or down. That's why I posted it. He never was, and never will be.
And yes, the sweet spot is between $60 and $70. Prices dropped almost $5 today. Two more of those days and Joe's policies will be responsible for oil price nirvana.
About 10 years ago I was talking to a management guy from Venoco at a party and he said that exact same thing.And yes, the sweet spot is between $60 and $70.
BuT tRump wAs rEsPonSiBle FoR OiL pRiceS?But Trump was responsible for oil prices?
No president is responsible for oil prices.But Trump was responsible for oil prices?
keep fighting the good fight. The industry is headed in the direction of EVs"Electric cars’ impact on air pollution isn’t as straightforward as you might think. The vehicles themselves pollute only slightly less than a gasoline car because their massive batteries and consequent weight leads to more particulate pollution from greater wear on brakes, tires and roads. On top of that, the additional electricity they require can throw up large amounts of air pollution depending on how it’s generated. One recent study found that electric cars put out more of the most dangerous particulate air pollution than gasoline-powered cars in 70% of U.S. states. An American Economic Association study found that rather than lowering air pollution, on average each additional electric car in the U.S. causes additional air-pollution damage worth $1,100 over its lifetime.
Even if rising costs weren’t an issue, electric cars wouldn’t be much of a bargain. Proponents argue that though they’re more expensive to purchase, electric cars are cheaper to drive. But a new report from a U.S. Energy Department laboratory found that even in 2025 the agency’s default electric car’s total lifetime cost will be 9% higher than a gasoline car’s, and the study relied on the very generous assumption that electric cars are driven as much as regular ones. In reality, electric cars are driven less than half as much, which means they’re much costlier per mile.
In part this is because electric cars are often a luxury item. Two-thirds of the households in the U.S. that own one have incomes exceeding $100,000 a year. For 9 in 10 of electric-vehicle-owning households, it’s only a second car. They also have a gasoline-powered car—usually a bigger one, such as an SUV, pickup truck or minivan—that they use for long trips, given its longer range. And it takes additional costs to make electric cars convenient—such as installing a charger in your garage. Those who can’t afford it, or who don’t have a garage, will have to spend a lot more time at commercial chargers than it takes to fill up a car with gasoline."
Opinion | Policies Pushing Electric Vehicles Show Why Few People Want One
They wouldn’t need huge subsidies to sell if they really were a good choice, and consumers know that.www.wsj.com
Oh, ok. Lol."Electric cars’ impact on air pollution isn’t as straightforward as you might think. The vehicles themselves pollute only slightly less than a gasoline car because their massive batteries and consequent weight leads to more particulate pollution from greater wear on brakes, tires and roads. On top of that, the additional electricity they require can throw up large amounts of air pollution depending on how it’s generated. One recent study found that electric cars put out more of the most dangerous particulate air pollution than gasoline-powered cars in 70% of U.S. states. An American Economic Association study found that rather than lowering air pollution, on average each additional electric car in the U.S. causes additional air-pollution damage worth $1,100 over its lifetime.
Even if rising costs weren’t an issue, electric cars wouldn’t be much of a bargain. Proponents argue that though they’re more expensive to purchase, electric cars are cheaper to drive. But a new report from a U.S. Energy Department laboratory found that even in 2025 the agency’s default electric car’s total lifetime cost will be 9% higher than a gasoline car’s, and the study relied on the very generous assumption that electric cars are driven as much as regular ones. In reality, electric cars are driven less than half as much, which means they’re much costlier per mile.
In part this is because electric cars are often a luxury item. Two-thirds of the households in the U.S. that own one have incomes exceeding $100,000 a year. For 9 in 10 of electric-vehicle-owning households, it’s only a second car. They also have a gasoline-powered car—usually a bigger one, such as an SUV, pickup truck or minivan—that they use for long trips, given its longer range. And it takes additional costs to make electric cars convenient—such as installing a charger in your garage. Those who can’t afford it, or who don’t have a garage, will have to spend a lot more time at commercial chargers than it takes to fill up a car with gasoline."
Opinion | Policies Pushing Electric Vehicles Show Why Few People Want One
They wouldn’t need huge subsidies to sell if they really were a good choice, and consumers know that.www.wsj.com
"OPINION""Electric cars’ impact on air pollution isn’t as straightforward as you might think. The vehicles themselves pollute only slightly less than a gasoline car because their massive batteries and consequent weight leads to more particulate pollution from greater wear on brakes, tires and roads. On top of that, the additional electricity they require can throw up large amounts of air pollution depending on how it’s generated. One recent study found that electric cars put out more of the most dangerous particulate air pollution than gasoline-powered cars in 70% of U.S. states. An American Economic Association study found that rather than lowering air pollution, on average each additional electric car in the U.S. causes additional air-pollution damage worth $1,100 over its lifetime.
Even if rising costs weren’t an issue, electric cars wouldn’t be much of a bargain. Proponents argue that though they’re more expensive to purchase, electric cars are cheaper to drive. But a new report from a U.S. Energy Department laboratory found that even in 2025 the agency’s default electric car’s total lifetime cost will be 9% higher than a gasoline car’s, and the study relied on the very generous assumption that electric cars are driven as much as regular ones. In reality, electric cars are driven less than half as much, which means they’re much costlier per mile.
In part this is because electric cars are often a luxury item. Two-thirds of the households in the U.S. that own one have incomes exceeding $100,000 a year. For 9 in 10 of electric-vehicle-owning households, it’s only a second car. They also have a gasoline-powered car—usually a bigger one, such as an SUV, pickup truck or minivan—that they use for long trips, given its longer range. And it takes additional costs to make electric cars convenient—such as installing a charger in your garage. Those who can’t afford it, or who don’t have a garage, will have to spend a lot more time at commercial chargers than it takes to fill up a car with gasoline."
Opinion | Policies Pushing Electric Vehicles Show Why Few People Want One
They wouldn’t need huge subsidies to sell if they really were a good choice, and consumers know that.www.wsj.com
So you regard all critical opinion pieces equal to a Dan Bongino video even those from the Wall Street Journal? Thanks for confirming what we thought of your intelligence level and critical thinking skills."OPINION"
You can never just post facts and discuss in your own words.
You always have someone else telling you what to think.
WACH THIS DANG BONGO VID