REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Can you read?Who got emails? Hal? Are you saying Hal is dishonest? I agree. Hal is dishonest.
lol! Who’s fault is that? I know nothing about his emails.lol, i dont really care. Was just letting you know that its an easy breadcrumb, even for dummies to follow.
Tell us the truth since you seem to know what it is.lol. - the truth is out there.
i'm actually heading out for a surf. small but sunny.Tell us the truth since you seem to know what it is.
I’m not accustomed to picking up breadcrumbs. Don’t be coy. You posted it, back it up.i'm actually heading out for a surf. small but sunny.
i've said enough by just mentioning that there is a breadcrumb in there.
The juiciest titbit of all concerns Trump’s former home, the gilded Fifth Avenue temple to his own ego dubbed “Versailles in the sky”, in which he lived before moving into the White House. James’s investigators were puzzled to find the Trump Tower triplex in Manhattan was listed at $327m in 2015, based on the apartment’s size, allegedly 30,000 sq feet.
In fact the property is 11,000 sq feet, which produces a value of $117m. That’s an overstatement in Trump’s official financial statements of more than $200m.
I don’t disagree that Trump is an asshole. The question I have is if the amount the taxpayers (I’m a taxpayer) have spent from when he was elected until today has been justifiable for the taxpayers. Think about it, that’s a lot of resources, both time, when our congressional representatives could have doing something for the taxpayers, and money. With zerofucks as a result. The same results as with the pedo cocamaniac Clinton.if i tripled the square footage of my house - and the value accordingly - in order to secure a loan, i would be committing fraud:
‘House of Trump is crumbling’: why ex-president’s legal net is tightening
Some Trumpland observers are convinced that he is in serious legal trouble as New York’s AG investigation of Trump Organization’s finances intensifieswww.theguardian.com
If it keeps him from being eligible to run for president again, I’m all inI don’t disagree that Trump is an asshole. The question I have is if the amount the taxpayers (I’m a taxpayer) have spent from when he was elected until today has been justifiable for the taxpayers. Think about it, that’s a lot of resources, both time, when our congressional representatives could have doing something for the taxpayers, and money. With zerofucks as a result. The same results as with the pedo cocamaniac Clinton.
Why wasn’t he prosecuted?Former Trump campaign adviser acknowledges being part of 2020 'alternate electors' plot — CNN Politics
Boris Epshteyn, an adviser for former President Donald Trump's 2020 presidential campaign, acknowledged Friday that he was part of the effort to prop up so-called "alternate electors" to support Trump in key states.apple.news
the hits keep coming.
Chump hardly knew anyone in his campaign.
When you say you’re all in does that mean you don’t care about the cost to the taxpayers? The sky is the limit?If it keeps him from being eligible to run for president again, I’m all in
Also actions have consequences
We should let criminals off the hook because it costs money to prosecute them?When you say you’re all in does that mean you don’t care about the cost to the taxpayers? The sky is the limit?
No. My question is what is a reasonable cost/effort. If you think he’s gonna end up in jail you be tripping. What have the taxpayers gotten for their contributions so far?We should let criminals off the hook because it costs money to prosecute them?
Also, I don't think paying taxes on your social security check makes you a taxpayer, since it's tax money to start with.
So if we prosecute criminals we can't solve the homeless problem?No. My question is what is a reasonable cost/effort. If you think he’s gonna end up in jail you be tripping. What have the taxpayers gotten for their contributions so far?
What has been the cost of trying to get to him. I’m thinking in the millions. Find the number.
I don’t make enough on SS to pay tax on it. I do pay federal taxes on investment income. Try harder. I’d prefer what I do pay not be invested in a witch-hunt. People are starving! Homeless! Where’s your empathy?
But no.
Who said that it would solve the homeless problem? I used that as an example of where tax $$ could better be invested.So if we prosecute criminals we can't solve the homeless problem?
Nice fallacy.
"Witch Hunt" lol
He's a fucking criminal, whether he ends up in jail or not , is irrelevant. You don't stop prosecuting criminals to save money.
Funny never heard you complain about Benghazi or Whitewater or any other Republican fishing expeditions. Suddenly when it involves scumbag Trump so concerned about tax dollars? In fact you mocked people who complained about Trumps unprecedented grifting off the taxpayer.Who said that it would solve the homeless problem? I used that as an example of where tax $$ could better be invested.
I have some news for you, cases are dropped by prosecutors every day due to insufficient resources to lead to trial with a probable conviction.
How much has been spent so far? Include the cost of the inspirational Pelosi impeachment pens.
You’re gonna need to back that up with a link.Funny never heard you complain about Benghazi or Whitewater or any other Republican fishing expeditions. Suddenly when it involves scumbag Trump so concerned about tax dollars? In fact you mocked people who complained about Trumps unprecedented grifting off the taxpayer.
If you say so, I didn’t say that. Link or stfu.We should stop prosecuting criminals if we don't have a 100% guaranteed conviction