REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
you might try the only advanced course he offers, Declaring Bankruptcy(Moral or otherwise), and move on to the next mark.
As someone who was expelled from three (3) faith based educational institutions I might observe that the bible does not indicate the race of Adam and Eve (I believe science tells us the first humans were probably black) and God did not "cancel" our first African couple but instead provided them with a path to redemption/eternal life.
God wasn't cancelling Adam and Eve, he was gentrifying the Garden of Eden as part of a bid submission for the new Amazon HQ.
The Garden was already gentrified. It was a paradise with a border. In the name of equality the entire word was turned into a sh!t-hole. There's a message in there somewhere I suppose...
Priorities. If your family is safe and you're able to help someone else out without getting hurt then sure, you'd go.
Oh, so then he really de-platformed, or de-plotfarmed, Adam and Eve over an apple.
God kind of seems like a psychopath.
Maybe if you did not spend all your time on getting expelled you would have learned something from these fine institutions. We have photographic evidence they were white as Billy Graham’s ass.
That letter was written in response to literally hundreds (thousands?) of verified stories of journalists, public figures, academics etc who have been fired, forced out, bullied, etc for saying controversial statements. The letter cites some examples. Matt Taibbi also had a lot of good examples, such as the Asian American journalist who was forced to apologize for tweeting a statement from a black activist at one of the protests who questioned why it’s only news when a white man kills a black man.
Wrong, you did that with your first post in this thread by claiming that the letter defended the right to be a bigot.
No, of course it isn’t, but what does that have to do with this letter? Did you even read it? If so, please point out where it said that you should be allowed to spew hate speech and keep your job.
Again, another one of your word salad rants where you argue against things that nobody said in the first place. Do you have a text file on your desk top where you cut and paste this tripe? You’re like serfdog with his global warming rants that he injects into anything tangentially related.
it also favored Asians who coincidentally sued Harvard for racial discrimination because they required higher SATs for Asians than any other group
nothing is perfectly objective but the SATs were the most objective standard compared to grades and extracurriculars
Seems a lot of people don't like what you deceitfully call "controversial statements".
It's true, the power structure is changing and with it the social norms.
