REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
***Official Impeachment Proceedings***
- Thread starter studog
- Start date
If Trump was in SF and stole a bike from Walmart valued less than $950, would it be a crime worthy of impeachment?
So basically, you support peach mints because of your rage over images like the one you just posted. You're obviously carrying a lot of rage over the tiny handful of kooks who did things like that in the Obama years. Nobody took people like that seriously back then.......but basically people like in your picture now represent the majority of the Democrat party. The party has been completely taken over by the looniest of the loons.
No. That’s not considered high crimes, misdemeanor, or bribery, I accordance with the U.S. Constitution, dummy.
What is considered so then? What high crime has been committed that the other party affected can testify against?
"Expert witness" testimony today is a waste of brain cells, except to help the TDS'ers confirm bias.
So much circus, so little substance.
Abuse of power that only someone in as high an office of president could commit. A common citizen could not commit this crime.
This is why the constitution prescribed impeachment as a remedy to abuses of power and gave congress sole oversight over presidential power.
There have literally been volumes upon volumes written on this topic, both by the Founding Fathers and by scholars since that time. Go take a civics course. Go read the constitution.
Your ignorance does not absolve you from the responsibility of gaining an understanding of how the American political system works.
What power was "abused" that meets the high crimes criteria?
Presidents have lots of entitled executive powers that some may not like or agree with.
Which ones exactly come even close to breaking laws or considered "high crimes or misdemeanors"? Let alone bribery or extortion.
Presidents have lots of entitled executive powers that some may not like or agree with.
Which ones exactly come even close to breaking laws or considered "high crimes or misdemeanors"? Let alone bribery or extortion.
Go read some news articles. Also listen to Trumby’s own COS openly admitting it was a quid pro quo.
Actively enlisting a foreign power to influence a election. Actively obstructing a Congressional investigation, whose powers are expressly granted by the constitution.
You’re either senile or stupid. Or both.
obstruction of justice - 10 occurrences
obstruction of Congress
lying under oath
bribery - withholding appropriated money by Congress is illegal too
Clinton was impeach for just one of those and completely unrelated to the Special council's initial investigation
that’s called moving the goal posts. You’re not denying he did it, you’re just saying it’s okay.
Yes. The call was perfect. Have you actually read the entire transcript. I have......have you?
Is this the 'any day' smurfdog has been asking for?So you also agree the call was "PERFECT" ?? )
