Originally Posted By: heelnipstr
Originally Posted By: GDaddy
Originally Posted By: hal9000
Originally Posted By: GDaddy

Not at all. Especially if you factor in the policy aspect. What policy objective will this accomplish?

There's better and then there's worse. I don't think there are many wall advocates who actually think that having a wall would be a silver bullet but most all of them think it will be better than not having a wall.

so is this better worth $67 Billion plus? Not counting all the legal issues of seizing private land.


Apparently there are a lot of Americans who think it would be worth it.