REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.
National parks/public land is one of the few things that are much more beneficial to the general population and parks themselves to remain in federal hands.
Not arguing against the value of parks. Just that they would be better run in the hands of the states. You guys in California have some great state parks. Do you think they'd be better run by the feds or at the state level?
What's the difference between conservatives and liberals?
Conservatives get angry when you lie to them. Liberals get angry when you tell them the truth.