REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.
So now, what say you, Surfdog? Make the argument one more time that local jurisdictions that aren't trained in immigration matters and aren't staffed to handle immigration matters and don't have the budgets to deal with immigration matters (and lawsuits) should still partake in immigration matters, even though areas with sanctuary laws are, in fact, SAFER.