REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.
Surprised some of you are so outraged by this. You’ve already admitted the loss of life is a sacrifice you’re all willing to take for the 2A.
The 2nd Amendment saves hundreds of lives every year. More importantly, it saves the lives of innocent intended victims. . .
While I don't disagree with your theory, there's no way to prove how many lives guns saved unless you can see into alternate futures.
I think the spirit of the sanctuary city is to prevent local LEO from doing the Fed's job. It's an unfair burden on border towns. Also if cops round up people for illegal immigration, they'll be less likely to report more serious crimes (rape, armed robberies, assault). That said, if someone is caught comitting serious crimes and they qualify for deportation, go for it.
Thing is, criminals involved with gangs and running drugs likely have a better network of safe houses and hookups than the average migrant looking to send money back home. The majority that get rounded up probably aren't the "bad hombres".