REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 32 of 34 1 2 30 31 32 33 34
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: FecalFace] #2968991
06/17/19 12:44 AM
06/17/19 12:44 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 7,070
A Beach
G
grapedrink Online happy
Phil Edwards status
grapedrink  Online Happy
Phil Edwards status
**
G

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 7,070
A Beach
Quote
Why are they talking about it if not to play victimz of liblur Silicon Valley?

It was mostly Rogan driving the conversation in that direction. Plus it is a part of a broader discussion of the role of social media platforms in keeping the public informed. If they were to be biased and act accordingly in the types of content they allow, a platform as influential as you tube carries a lot of power in terms of what information citizens, and most importantly voters, are exposed to. Especially with people (i.e. voters) that only get their information from a single source or platform.

IMO we are already seeing the implications of this, as people stay within echo chambers curated by the social media platforms themselves. This is an issue on the left and the right.

Plus Pakman argued that Crowder violated the TOS. Most of his positions were fairly liberal as well. The majority of the whining came from Rogan.

That said, I don't listen to the fight shows either. I delete probably half of the episodes before listening to them. Also, if they don't catch my interest by the 25-30 minute mark, I move on, because they will probably never get there.


You forgot it was STOLEN?!
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: ifallalot] #2969002
06/17/19 02:00 AM
06/17/19 02:00 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,691
LA
B
bird. Offline
Phil Edwards status
bird.  Offline
Phil Edwards status
**
B

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,691
LA
Originally Posted by ifallalot
“Lispy queer” is the new “faggot?”

Can we attack the LGBTQEHWIHDHEJEUDBBWKEBEI++{#]* community for using “queer” as a descriptor?


It's using the word queer in a derogatory manner. You don't see that?

Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: bird.] #2969004
06/17/19 02:11 AM
06/17/19 02:11 AM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,702
In Gods Country
C
CharmingSophisticate Offline
Duke status
CharmingSophisticate  Offline
Duke status
**
C

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 20,702
In Gods Country
Originally Posted by bird.
Originally Posted by ifallalot
“Lispy queer” is the new “faggot?”

Can we attack the LGBTQEHWIHDHEJEUDBBWKEBEI++{#]* community for using “queer” as a descriptor?


It's using the word queer in a derogatory manner. You don't see that?

So if a Fag calls a Homo a Queer we have a problem?

It seems to me that that would just be assigning a higher level of Faggotry to the Homo in question.

I'd like to know what Google Scripture has to say about this but I think only High Priests have access.


"...now tell me that wasn't fun!" Capt. Jack Aubrey
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: frvcvs] #2969005
06/17/19 02:18 AM
06/17/19 02:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 23,160
Carlsbad
G
GDaddy Offline
Duke status
GDaddy  Offline
Duke status
**
G

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 23,160
Carlsbad
So calling someone a queer who identifies such is worse than falsely calling someone a racist or a nazi?

How about when Colbert said Trump was Putin's kawk holster? That's not using an allegation of homosexuality in a demeaning manner?


#sowhat
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: GDaddy] #2969006
06/17/19 02:22 AM
06/17/19 02:22 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,691
LA
B
bird. Offline
Phil Edwards status
bird.  Offline
Phil Edwards status
**
B

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,691
LA
Originally Posted by GDaddy
So calling someone a queer who identifies such is worse than falsely calling someone a racist or a nazi?


What?


Quote

How about when Colbert said Trump was Putin's kawk holster? That's not using an allegation of homosexuality in a demeaning manner?


There are A LOT of really bad homophobic jokes that left wingers have made about the Trump/Putin connection.

Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: frvcvs] #2969007
06/17/19 02:26 AM
06/17/19 02:26 AM
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 599
I
i_shapes Offline
Nep status
i_shapes  Offline
Nep status
**
I

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 599


Don't demonitize me.


"fvck this country." - Frvcus
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: FecalFace] #2969008
06/17/19 02:38 AM
06/17/19 02:38 AM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 380
San Clemente, Ca
M
MaxKookage Offline
Legend (inyourownmind)
MaxKookage  Offline
Legend (inyourownmind)
M

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 380
San Clemente, Ca
Originally Posted by FecalFace
Originally Posted by MaxKookage
Originally Posted by ifallalot
“Lispy queer” is the new “faggot?”

Can we attack the LGBTQEHWIHDHEJEUDBBWKEBEI++{#]* community for using “queer” as a descriptor?

Special classes are beyond critique.

They can harass one another and people outside their group, but it is forbidden to engage in a debate with them.

See fecals arguing points as an example.


If you don't uderstand why you can't call somebody a queer but gay people can use the word amongst themselves, you are a fvcking moron.

So what derogatory terms of endearment are off limits to the "oppressed"?

White, Male, Masculine, Heterosexual, Dad, Role Model, Responsible, Accountable?

How do you get in a club that is immune to scrutiny?

Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: MaxKookage] #2969009
06/17/19 02:40 AM
06/17/19 02:40 AM
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,691
LA
B
bird. Offline
Phil Edwards status
bird.  Offline
Phil Edwards status
**
B

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,691
LA
Originally Posted by MaxKookage
How do you get in a club that is immune to scrutiny?


You're already in one.

Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: bird.] #2969016
06/17/19 03:09 AM
06/17/19 03:09 AM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 380
San Clemente, Ca
M
MaxKookage Offline
Legend (inyourownmind)
MaxKookage  Offline
Legend (inyourownmind)
M

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 380
San Clemente, Ca
Originally Posted by bird.
Originally Posted by MaxKookage
How do you get in a club that is immune to scrutiny?


You're already in one.

Yay!

who's the grand Poobah?

Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: MaxKookage] #2969036
06/17/19 06:02 AM
06/17/19 06:02 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 33,673
your mom
F
FecalFace Offline
Duke status
FecalFace  Offline
Duke status
**
F

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 33,673
your mom
Originally Posted by MaxKookage
Originally Posted by FecalFace
Originally Posted by MaxKookage
Originally Posted by ifallalot
“Lispy queer” is the new “faggot?”

Can we attack the LGBTQEHWIHDHEJEUDBBWKEBEI++{#]* community for using “queer” as a descriptor?

Special classes are beyond critique.

They can harass one another and people outside their group, but it is forbidden to engage in a debate with them.

See fecals arguing points as an example.


If you don't uderstand why you can't call somebody a queer but gay people can use the word amongst themselves, you are a fvcking moron.

So what derogatory terms of endearment are off limits to the "oppressed"?

White, Male, Masculine, Heterosexual, Dad, Role Model, Responsible, Accountable?

How do you get in a club that is immune to scrutiny?


Common sense, that's how you get in the club.

You don't have it.

Homophobia is back in fashion, as seen in that homophobic cop thread, Crowder etc... but you're putting oppressed under quotation marks?

You're all over the place.


"The real enemy are the (gun) manufactures of your toys and the NRA. They play on your fear to steal your money." - ifallalot / 2014
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: GDaddy] #2969038
06/17/19 06:06 AM
06/17/19 06:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 33,673
your mom
F
FecalFace Offline
Duke status
FecalFace  Offline
Duke status
**
F

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 33,673
your mom
Originally Posted by GDaddy
So calling someone a queer who identifies such is worse than falsely calling someone a racist or a nazi?


So how many times are you going to make this fallacy? You know what they say about people who repeat the same mistake and never learn.

behavior =/= identity

Are you considering being a racist an identity? roflmao

Originally Posted by GDaddy
How about when Colbert said Trump was Putin's kawk holster? That's not using an allegation of homosexuality in a demeaning manner?


You are out of touch with the world and you don't understand how context works. Like no fvcking clue.

Basic stuff.


"The real enemy are the (gun) manufactures of your toys and the NRA. They play on your fear to steal your money." - ifallalot / 2014
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: GDaddy] #2969071
06/17/19 12:10 PM
06/17/19 12:10 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 23,844
A
afoaf Offline
Duke status
afoaf  Offline
Duke status
**
A

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 23,844
Originally Posted by GDaddy
The Pinterest whistleblower brought the smoking gun with him which included the handle of the individual in that company who dorked their program to treat these figures like porn sites and you still don't want to believe that so I highly doubt there's any such thing as any form of "proof" that would you would find persuasive.

These companies are using "manifest observable behavior" as their criteria to act so I don't think it's at all unfair to apply the same measure to their own conduct. The BPS takedown was an example and there are others. He didn't call anyone a faggot nor does he have any history of doing anything edgy beyond critique globalism and political figures but he still got taken down. Time Pool didn't call anyone names or direct harassment to anyone - all he did was the same thing the mainstream outlets have been doing with the story and his vid got censored. These are not accidental nor coincidental.

Getting back to BPSs content, now that YT has walked his ban back his content is up again. You can go see for yourself if his content style was anything approaching transgressive. It's obviously not, but you'll never know for yourself unless you go and look.



you're talking about pinterest and a single actor at pinterest.

you also continue to mischaracterize the BPS situation by 1) ignoring the profit
motive this guy has to adulterate the dust up and 2) ignoring the fact that derivative
content would also likely trigger the same privacy review as the parent content.

I've watched the content. there's nothing there. the only thing his video was taken
down for was, by his own admission, a privacy complaint review.

you can try to make it more than that, but, regardless of how he judges the merits
of that, an automated takedown and review process occurred and the content is
back up. if we don't want to get swept up in triggered review systems, perhaps we
don't try to walk that particular tight rope....but then again, he's now received a lot
of attention and views (read: $$$) by hitching his wagon to this foolish narrative.


if you haven't smoked DMT you have no credibility on any subject in surfing or outside of surfing...
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: frvcvs] #2969088
06/17/19 01:06 PM
06/17/19 01:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 16,657
E
ElOgro Offline
Duke status
ElOgro  Offline
Duke status
**
E

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 16,657
Wiggers puleeze. bigdeal


"That's their respect for me... I got leid," Rabbit Kekai

"That's all it takes--one moment." Sponge
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: ElOgro] #2969090
06/17/19 01:09 PM
06/17/19 01:09 PM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 23,844
A
afoaf Offline
Duke status
afoaf  Offline
Duke status
**
A

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 23,844
I'm going to deplatform you


if you haven't smoked DMT you have no credibility on any subject in surfing or outside of surfing...
Re: Nytimes: The Making of a YouTube Radical [Re: afoaf] #2969093
06/17/19 01:12 PM
06/17/19 01:12 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 16,657
E
ElOgro Offline
Duke status
ElOgro  Offline
Duke status
**
E

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 16,657
Originally Posted by afoaf
I'm going to deplatform you


Not without crew serviced weapons you’re not. missle


"That's their respect for me... I got leid," Rabbit Kekai

"That's all it takes--one moment." Sponge
Page 32 of 34 1 2 30 31 32 33 34

Moderated by  Groundswell, Nameless60, r32