|
REMINDER: Siteowner has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, Siteowner reserves the right to review the Materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such Materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. Siteowner has no obligation to display or post any Materials provided by you. Siteowner reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or Materials that Siteowner deems necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. To further read the rules and terms of agreement of this Forum, click here.
|
|
#2612149 - 03/03/17 12:02 AM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: GDaddy]
|
Duke status
Registered: 11/21/08
Posts: 30451
Loc: down der by the harbor
|
C'mon now
This is nowhere near the equivalency of a Secretary of State violating the law for the express purpose of avoiding lawful oversight. State level, state rules. LOL GTFO
_________________________
"Your a dick." - Greg Griffin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612151 - 03/03/17 12:12 AM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: GDaddy]
|
Nep status
Registered: 03/28/10
Posts: 940
Loc: Oahu
|
Well, if you're measuring fairness by the degree to which they're getting hassled that's fine.
But there still is no equivalency between Pence conducting business as usual in his role as a state governor vs Hillary conducting the nation's security and foreign policy affairs on a private server that was only established in order to unlawfully avoid oversight.
There are enough other things to hassle these guys for without engaging in the false equivalencies. That just makes you guys look desperate.
Guess you forgot about the FBI's findings: “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.” And didn't read the article "As governor, Pence oversaw Indiana's state police, national guard and department of homeland security, all of which collaborate with federal authorities and handle sensitive information." I will say that yes, SOS and governor are different, so this isn't exactly apples to apples. It still reeks of hypocrisy though.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612152 - 03/03/17 12:14 AM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: GDaddy]
|
Miki Dora status
Registered: 07/29/09
Posts: 4532
Loc: Southern Tip, Norcal
|
Well, if you're measuring fairness by the degree to which they're getting hassled that's fine.
But there still is no equivalency between Pence conducting business as usual in his role as a state governor vs Hillary conducting the nation's security and foreign policy affairs on a private server that was only established in order to unlawfully avoid oversight.
There are enough other things to hassle these guys for without engaging in the false equivalencies. That just makes you guys look desperate.
you should move on from the HRC crap because they could never pin an unlawful act on her. If they could they certainly would have. http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpoliti...ils-and-the-law
_________________________
If you see a Buddha in the road, ask which gender pronouns they prefer and then kill them.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612353 - 03/03/17 05:13 PM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: GDaddy]
|
Michael Peterson status
Registered: 08/09/06
Posts: 3295
Loc: Location Location
|
Well, if you're measuring fairness by the degree to which they're getting hassled that's fine.
But there still is no equivalency between Pence conducting business as usual in his role as a state governor vs Hillary conducting the nation's security and foreign policy affairs on a private server that was only established in order to unlawfully avoid oversight.
There are enough other things to hassle these guys for without engaging in the false equivalencies. That just makes you guys look desperate.
"you guys?" What is this, some kind of fvcking football game? I voted for a Republican governor in my home state twice. I just voted for a Republican state rep. I live in a state dominated by Democrats. I work in a different state also dominated by Democrats. These places have major, major problems. I am under no illusion that one-party dominance is a good thing. It's not. I just think the hypocrisy on display from both sides is, at this point, nothing short of stunning.
_________________________
I've been banned from better websites than this one.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612363 - 03/03/17 05:45 PM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: rice]
|
Duke status
Registered: 01/11/02
Posts: 48068
Loc: The Bar
|
"you guys?" What is this, some kind of fvcking football game?
Yes, it is. You pick your team and that's it; defend your team no matter what.  I, for one, am disappointed we were not given flags to throw and penalties to assess! Unsportsmanlike Conduct Delay of Game Palpably Unfair Act Targeting Illegal Hands to the Pussy Could you imagine this election cycle? It'd be like a Raider Game!  I'd love to tell a ref that it was a fake penalty. Perhaps we can also refer to safeties as alternative touchdowns.
_________________________
Nothing is obscene provided it is done in bad taste.
Russ Meyer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612375 - 03/03/17 06:19 PM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: GDaddy]
|
Duke status
Registered: 01/21/14
Posts: 16580
Loc: West of the Atlantic. East of...
|
There are enough other things to hassle these guys for without engaging in the false equivalencies. That just makes you guys look desperate.
Shhhhhh!!!!!! Don't tell them that. They think this stuff is persuasive. Let the democrats act like desperate, crybaby, sore losers. Its such a great strategy for them.
_________________________
“This is a bad day for the news media. Let’s not kid ourselves,” Toobin said on CNN. “The larger message that a lot of people are going to take from this story is that the news media are a bunch of leftist liars who are dying to get the president, and they’re willing to lie to do it.”
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612380 - 03/03/17 06:23 PM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: GromsDad]
|
Duke status
Registered: 01/11/02
Posts: 48068
Loc: The Bar
|
There are enough other things to hassle these guys for without engaging in the false equivalencies. That just makes you guys look desperate.
Shhhhhh!!!!!! Don't tell them that. They think this stuff is persuasive. Let the democrats act like desperate, crybaby, sore losers. Its such a great strategy for them. It's fair for you to get a turn after we listened to you constantly pule about Obamacare. It was a good strategy too.
_________________________
Nothing is obscene provided it is done in bad taste.
Russ Meyer
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2612387 - 03/03/17 06:28 PM
Re: Private email servers for Democrats BAD!! For Repubs OKAY!!
[Re: Kento]
|
Duke status
Registered: 01/21/14
Posts: 16580
Loc: West of the Atlantic. East of...
|
There are enough other things to hassle these guys for without engaging in the false equivalencies. That just makes you guys look desperate.
Shhhhhh!!!!!! Don't tell them that. They think this stuff is persuasive. Let the democrats act like desperate, crybaby, sore losers. Its such a great strategy for them. It's fair for you to get a turn after we listened to you constantly pule about Obamacare. It was a good strategy too. Obamacare was real......not imaginary like all this Russia bullshit.
_________________________
“This is a bad day for the news media. Let’s not kid ourselves,” Toobin said on CNN. “The larger message that a lot of people are going to take from this story is that the news media are a bunch of leftist liars who are dying to get the president, and they’re willing to lie to do it.”
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous Topic
Index
