This is what’s known as an oxymoron.secular religion
REMINDER: THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to monitor the Forums. However, THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to review any materials submitted to or posted on the Forums, and remove, delete, redact or otherwise modify such materials, in its sole discretion and for any reason whatsoever, at any time and from time to time, without notice or further obligation to you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. has no obligation to display or post any materials provided by you. THE ARENA PLATFORM, INC. reserves the right to disclose, at any time and from time to time, any information or materials that we deem necessary or appropriate to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, contract obligation, legal or dispute process or government request. Click on the following hyperlinks to further read the applicable Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
This is what’s known as an oxymoron.secular religion
i think "ideology" is a better word for it than "secular religion" but it is indeed possessed by the same close-minded dogmatism and bigotry that makes the religious fundamentalists so dangerousOne party is polluted by the tenets of an established religion. The other party has created its own secular religion
Would you like to qualify this claim in some way? No? I didn’t think so.i think "ideology" is a better word for it than "secular religion" but it is indeed possessed by the same close-minded dogmatism and bigotry that makes the religious fundamentalists so dangerous
Are you really denying the dogmatic rituals and punishments for heresies?Would you like to qualify this claim in some way? No? I didn’t think so.
in summary, you were wrong, you conceded the point I was making, but just to maintain consistency you also inserted a deeply idiotic and hyperbolic claimOne party is polluted by the tenets of an established religion. The other party has created its own secular religion
You must be new here.in summary, you were wrong, you conceded the point I was making, but just to maintain consistency you also inserted a deeply idiotic and hyperbolic claim
The biblical god as simply been supplanted by the state, complete with saints, dogmas, and ritualsin summary, you were wrong, you conceded the point I was making, but just to maintain consistency you also inserted a deeply idiotic and hyperbolic claim
So no one believes in God anymore?The biblical god as simply been supplanted by the state, complete with saints, dogmas, and rituals
Why is it always binary and all or nothing with you people?So no one believes in God anymore?
So not thinking in binaries, the state didn't replace God?Why is it always binary and all or nothing with you people?
Get better
Depends on who you are. For many people, it hasSo not thinking in binaries, the state didn't replace God?
Why does one need to replace the other?Depends on who you are. For many people, it has
One replaces the other because some people need saints, dogma, rituals, good-evil binary, etc in order to make sense of a complicated worldWhy does one need to replace the other?
Can't a person belong to both a state and a religion?
Remember, binary bad!
Or is it that we all belong to secular religions and some of us belong to both secular and religious religions? Or is this just a fucking stupid conversation?
Can you explain how all the various sciences and philosophies in the world are somehow less complicated than, say, the Bible? No? I didn't think so.One replaces the other because some people need saints, dogma, rituals, good-evil binary, etc in order to make sense of a complicated world
According to Sharky's Wiki link, a 'secular religion' is merely any communal belief system. For example, everyone believes that paper money has the value printed on it, therefore money is religious. Stupid, right? Everyone may believe that paper money has the value printed on it but everyone also knows that the value is entirely dependent on social agreement. Everyone knows that the paper doesn't have inherent value, in other words, and no preacher man or political saint can make people believe that paper money has inherent value... well, unless they're preaching to superstitious religious folk.Your framing is off, that's why you think it s stupid conversation